Channel
@TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
14,943subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001485597566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran |
| Description | تفسیر آسان قرآن = تفسیر میسرّ تاليف: عائض القرنی لینک کوتاه کانال @TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran هر روز تفسیر یک الی سه آیه از تفسیر میسر اثر دکتر عائض القرنی را در این کانال به خواست خداوند متعال خواهیم گذاشت. إن شاءالله |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 14,943 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 14,942 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 14,944 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 14,952 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 14,955 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 14,963 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 14,970 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 14,968 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 14,975 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 14,982 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 14,989 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 14,989 | first reading |
162 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 162 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 162 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 33,044 |
| Reactions total | 111 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 37 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 88.6% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌺اگر به محتوای اسلامی علاقهمندید، کانالهای زیر رو از دست ندید. ━━━━━━━━━••━┅┄ l لیستی از بهترین نشریات اسلامی 🌺 @Tab_sunnah_noor 🌺 @Motakhallefin_channel ━━━━━━━━━••━┅┄
📝#لذت_علم 📃#علم برای #قلب مانند باران برای زمین است. همانطور که زمین بدون باران زنده نمیشود، #قلب نیز بدون #علم زنده نمیشود. 👈 طالبان #علم برای دریافت مطالب #علم_شرعی این جا را کلیک کنید 👇👇 @pleasure_elm @pleasure_elm
📚 در اینجا مهم ترین کتابهای اسلامی را در قالب فرمت های word , PDF , APK در اختیار طلاب علوم شرعی دانش پژوهان و محققین و عموم مردم قرار می دهیم. 📚هر کتابی که خواستید اینجا راحت دانلود کنید @the_library_2 رایگانِ رایگان👇👇 📚⁀⋱‿📚⁀⋱‿📚 @the_library_2 @the_library_2 📚⁀⋱‿📚⁀⋱‿📚
📖#بلاغت 📖 ◆ آیا تا به حال متوجه شدهاید که جایگزینی یک کلمه با کلمه دیگر در قرآن غیرممکن است؟ برخی تصور میکنند که مترادفها دقیقاً همان معنی را منتقل میکنند؛ با این حال، با تأمل در قرآن کریم، متوجه میشویم که هر کلمه با دقت شگفتانگیزی قرار گرفته است. تغییر حتی یک کلمه میتواند معنی را تغییر دهد یا باعث شود که بخشی از زیبایی آن از بین برود. به سخنان خداوند متعال توجه کنید: ﴿وَاشْتَعَلَ الرَّأْسُ شَیْبًا﴾ «و سر ا…
❤2
📖#اهل_قرآن 📖 امام ابن قیم رحمه الله فرموده است: 🗣️✨ "اهل قرآن کسانی هستند که بدان علم دارند و به محتوای آن عمل میکنند، هرچند که آن را از حفظ نداشته باشند 🤔📚 اما کسی که آن را حفظ کند و آنرا نفهمد و به محتوای آن عمل نکند، از اهل قرآن نیست، هرچند که حروف آن را همانند نیزه بلند کند 🙅♂️⚔️". منبع: زاد المعاد (۳۲۷/۱) 📜 📖تفسیر آسان قرآن @TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran • •• •• ✺✺••✺✺ •• •• •
❀﴿وَإِنِّي خِفۡتُ ٱلۡمَوَٰلِيَ مِن وَرَآءِي وَكَانَتِ ٱمۡرَأَتِي عَاقِرٗا فَهَبۡ لِي مِن لَّدُنكَ وَلِيّٗا ﴾《مریم: ۵》 ۵) و من پس از [مرگ] خود از خویشاوندانم [نسبت به حفظِ دین تو] بیمناکم و همسرم [نیز] نازاست؛ پس به لطف خویش [فرزندی به عنوان وارث و] یاور به من عطا فرما. - عاقراً ف هَبْ! «به من، که عقیم هستم، فرزندی عطا کن!». ذهن شما از میزان اطمینانی که در این دعا وجود دارد، شگفتزده میشود. این آیه، هم مانع را در ب…
✵#تفسیر_سوره_نازعات✵ ✺آیه:❸ ﴿وَٱلسَّٰبِحَٰتِ سَبۡحٗا ٣﴾. و به فرشتگانی سوگند یاد نموده که به امر و حکم پروردگار در آسمان صعود و نزول مینمایند و هر صنفی از ایشان در پیشگاه عظمت و نیروی پادشاه و سلطان جهان به کاری مصروف اند. 📖تفسیر آسان قرآن @TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran • •• •• ✺✺••✺✺ •• •• •
Sticker, posted without a caption
✵#تفسیر_سوره_نازعات✵ ✺آیه:❷ ﴿وَٱلنَّٰشِطَٰتِ نَشۡطٗا ٢﴾. الله (عزوجل) به فرشتگانی سوگند یاد کرده که ارواح مؤمنان را با لطف و نرمی و با آسانی و مهربانی بیرون میآورند؛ چنانکه قطرۀ آب از دهن ظرف به آسانی بیرون میشود. 📖تفسیر آسان قرآن @TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran • •• •• ✺✺••✺✺ •• •• •
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
✵#تفسیر_سوره_نازعات✵ ✺آیه:❶ بِسۡمِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ﴿وَٱلنَّٰزِعَٰتِ غَرۡقٗا ١﴾. خداوند متعال به فرشتگانی سوگند یاد کرده است که ارواح کافران را با قوّت و سختی میگیرند؛ طوری که با درد و مشقّت و با عذاب و حسرت از همه اجزای وجود آنان بیرون میکشند. 📖تفسیر آسان قرآن @TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran • •• •• ✺✺••✺✺ •• •• •
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 475,443 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تفسیر آسان قرآن” (@TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran), 14,943 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TAFSIR_ASAN_Quran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.