Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🤣2🍌1👎1🗿1

Channel
@TACWLM
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002415188041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TACWLM |
| Description | TENNESSEE WLM CHAPTER |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TACWLM |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 68 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 68 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 16 | 18.2% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 17.0% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 11.4% | |
| 🗿 | 9 | 10.2% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 6.82% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2025 to 7 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🤣2🍌1👎1🗿1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥4👎1🗿1🆒1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🍌1👎1🔥1🗿1
Jeff Tischauser, an SPLC employee that has been participating in ICE protests in Chicago, wants put ICE agents on trial and potentially execute them. Is this a threat to federal LE?
👎1
FBI: "all ties with the SPLC have officially been terminated." "The Southern Poverty Law Center long ago abandoned civil rights work and turned into a partisan smear machine. Their so-called “hate map” has been used to defame mainstream Americans and even inspired violence. That disgraceful record makes them unfit for any FBI partnership." https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/1974111441671123293
👎1
📍 Tennessee Active Club Hey white man...... it's time. Time to protect our own, time to stand for our culture, time to defend our way of life, time to defend our legacy, OUR country. It's time white man, to fight back. Tribe up today! Get vetted today https://t.me/TennesseeACVetting https://t.me/middleTNAC https://t.me/MemphisAC https://t.me/SmokeyMountainAC
🔥4🍌1👎1🗿1
MemphisAC on the scene 💪 https://t.me/MemphisAC
👌15💩4🙏4❤3🗿2🍌1👎1🤣1
Mid Tennessee active club hosted a training with https://t.me/SmokeyMountainAC Boxing, mma instruction and jiu-jitsu were worked over the course of 3 hours. Tribe and Train XIV "In peace, like the wise man, make preparations for war" ⚔
⚡4👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4👎1
Antifa is worried that showing up to black bloc events with children and families with galvanize the right and so they are depending on their oldest strategy of sowing division. Share this with everyone you can. Treat everyone who attempts to create division among the ranks of the “right wing” as antifa because they might as well be. Republicans are not /our guys/ but they are the majority of the country and they a…
🔥2🍌1👎1🗿1
🇺🇸🚩🤖❌🇺🇸🇺🇸 — During the Biden administration, a patriot, Kai Liam Nix, infiltrated Antifa cell discord servers and discovered vital and sometimes even compromising information. ➡️ Nix managed to shut down many of these servers and doxx many high-ranking individuals associated with these poisonous anti-American organizations. ➡️ Nix founded the 'Appalachian Archives', later, 'American Archives', to document his findi…
🍌1👎1🗿1
this bugman thinks he's sherlock homes writing in a little notebook about side walk graffit.. smh ..
❤🔥1🍓1🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TACWLM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TACWLM named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TENNESSEE ACTION” (@TACWLM), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TACWLM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.