Channel
@SybilZero
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,112subscribers
-58 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002025639227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SybilZero |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SybilZero |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 1,112 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 1,123 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 1,124 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 1,129 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 1,135 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 1,144 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 1,147 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 1,152 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 1,162 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 1,166 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 1,170 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 1,170 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
157 reactions across 17 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 17.2% | |
| 🦄 | 16 | 10.2% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 9.55% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 8.28% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 7.64% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 6.37% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 6.37% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 5.10% | |
| 😇 | 8 | 5.10% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 4.46% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 3.82% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 3.18% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 2.55% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.91% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.637% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.637% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.637% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2024 to 5 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NPCs - system ping detected. The simulation is syncing. Background characters are being upgraded. If you’re reading this, you’re already inside the event. ⚡️ Like 🔁 Repost 💬 Drop your SOL wallet https://x.com/Simulation_Wiki/status/2019442377782370351?s=20 #Like #Repost #Drop #AirDrop
Gm 🔥
❤1
HB, Paul 🎉
HB @dogs 🎉🔑
🔥2
Congrats, Paul! 🎉 🔑
id0 hb 🎉
❤3
HB, digital pioneer, shaper of freedom – keep pushing boundaries! 👨💻
❤3🎉2🥰2🤗1🦄1😇1😎1
💬📵 Real communication is impossible through fake accounts. True connections are the foundation of meaningful interactions, whether online or offline. But how can genuine conversations happen when they’re filtered through layers of fake profiles? It’s like trying to talk through a wall of screens—nothing real can break through. "Genuine connections can’t be faked." Behind every real interaction is trust, authenticit…
❤4🐳3👍3⚡1🕊1🤩1🦄1🙏1
🔄⛏ Sybilling is work without purpose. Imagine digging a hole just to fill it back up again. No progress, no achievement, just endless, meaningless effort. That’s what sybilling really is—spending time on actions that lead nowhere, leaving you stuck in a loop of pointless tasks with nothing to show for it. "Work without purpose" sums up the essence of this cycle. While it might seem like you’re being productive, in …
🦄3❤2🔥2🐳1🕊1🤩1😇1
🏆💪 True rewards come through honesty and hard work. There’s something uniquely fulfilling about lifting a trophy that you’ve truly earned. It’s not just about the reward itself—it’s about the journey, the integrity, and the honest effort that brought you there. Real success is built on authenticity, dedication, and resilience, not shortcuts and deceit. "Earn it the honest way" isn’t just a motto—it’s a mindset. In …
❤3🔥2🕊2💊1🤩1🦄1😇1😎1
🏅🎭 Fake accounts, fake rewards. Imagine standing on a stage, arms full of medals, only to realize that every single one of them is labeled "Fake." The applause fades, and the emptiness sets in. That’s the reality of chasing after fake achievements—moments that might look impressive on the surface but hold no real value or satisfaction. "Fake accounts, fake rewards" captures the hollow nature of these so-called succ…
🦄2😇2🙏2🎉1👍1🕊1😎1🙊1
⌨️🔄 Sybilling: registration is endless. Have you ever felt like you’re stuck in an infinite loop, endlessly filling out form after form with no end in sight? That’s the reality of sybilling—a repetitive cycle of registrations that leads nowhere, offering no real progress or fulfillment. It’s a treadmill of empty effort, where the only result is more of the same. "Endless forms, no real progress." This phrase captur…
🦄4❤1❤🔥1💊1💘1🕊1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SybilZero. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SybilZero” (@SybilZero), 1,112 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SybilZero.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.