Channel
@Sw0rd_0f_Time
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003915631947 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sw0rd_0f_Time |
| Description | Предупреждаю: блог не соответствует канону (если у игрока вообще может существовать канон..) |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 5 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sw0rd_0f_Time |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 40 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 40 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 588 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 47.4% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 26.3% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 10.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ִִ۫𝆬 🤩ׄ ׁ 𔔁 ֪ 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ࣪˖ ⚔️ ִ ۫ 𝂅 ྀི۫ ꒰ 🩳 ꒱ - Всем привет! Давно я что то не писал сюда... Ммм... Как вы тут? ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ – Знайте... На днях я случайно столкнулся с каким-то человеком.. Я не увдел лица. Так ещё и положил ко мне в карман какую-то странную штуку и быстро убежал. Да я знаю звучит как какойто бред и мне надо было что то сделать, но это было слишком быстро из за чего я не успел в…
❤4
🌟-дорогие впшеры если вы хотите написать на счет вп то пожайлуста пишите каналы юзом! списочники тоже самое: если ваш список находится в отдельном канале то пишите юзом! UPD:: разрешили ссылки но на всякий случай пишите юзом
ִִ۫𝆬 🤩ׄ ׁ 𔔁 ֪ 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ࣪˖ ⚔️ ִ ۫ 𝂅 ྀི۫ ꒰ 🖼 ꒱ - Фух... С ним всё было хорошо... Правда не мог дотянуться до пульта от кондиционера из за чего ему было жарко... У НЕГО ТАМ МЕНЬШЕ -60° КАКОЙ ЖАРКО? Хотя... Наверно для пингвинов это нормально.. ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ –Так ещё чуть не убил. Я только к двери подошёл а он опять со своим «Я ТЕБЯ УБЬЮ». Хорошо что не достал ракетницу... ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ –Мммм... Над…
❤2
#впПестее
ִִ۫𝆬 🤩ׄ ׁ 𔔁 ֪ 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ࣪˖ ⚔️ ִ ۫ 𝂅 ྀི۫ ꒰ 📖 ꒱ - Всем привет! Как поживайте? Как деньки ваши проходят? ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ –У меня вот в последнее время как то даже... Одиноко что ли... Не серьезно! Мне правда хочется с кем-то поболтать, но... Я не могу найти контакты своих друзей... Ладно. Думаю потом ещё поискать. Возможно найду хоть кого-то. ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ –И ещё у нас стало очень жарко! Последние ден…
❤2
ִִ۫𝆬 🤩ׄ ׁ 𔔁 ֪ 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ࣪˖ ⚔️ ִ ۫ 𝂅 ྀི۫ ꒰ 🤩 ꒱ - Игрок, а у тебя были когда то отношения? ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ꒰ 📖 ꒱ - Ммм... К сожалению нет не встречаюсь. Хоть я немного видел слегка странные рассказы со мной и с некоторыми знакомыми(🌟/🌟/🌟/...) и даже весьма... Не оч приличного содержания... Боже как это теперь развидеть... ꒰ ˚ ₊ 🧽 ・┈ · ┈ 🌸 ┈ · ┈ ・ 🧽 ° ₊ ꒱
👀3🥰1
ִִ۫𝆬 🤩ׄ ׁ 𔔁 ֪ 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ࣪˖ ⚔️ ִ ۫ 𝂅 ྀི۫ ꒰ 📖 ꒱ - Всем привет! Как поживайте? Я вот вернулся в Бризвил и теперь милиордер. Так завидуйте молча) ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ –Ладно шучу. Просто мне подарили 2 слитка золота и я обменял их на 600 тиксов. Кстати... Что то давно вопросов небыло... Может зададите парочку? (Мне правда скучно сидеть без дела...) ꒰ ˚ ₊ 🧽 ・┈ · ┈ 🌸 ┈ · ┈ ・ 🧽 ° ₊ ꒱
🍓3
· ➖➖➖➖➖ ➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖ · ┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉ Примечание: просьба заполнять строго по анкете! Любой пропуск одного из пунктов – автоматом отказ! ╌┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈╌ 🔡🔠🔠🔠🔡🔡🔣 1. Псевдо, местоимения, эмодзи(прем/без) 2. Должность (впшер, модер) 3. Опыт работы (пока принимаем тех у кого нет в будущем поменяем) 4. Сколько сможете примерно уделять время на вп/на слежк…
🌟-Так... Ладно надо будет сделать набор в адм(знаю рано но руки нужны)
🌟-окей не буду пересоздовать. посты кст я сегодня кину. на все вп отвечу
🌟-у меня появилась идея пересоздать канал... вы как думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ִִ۫𝆬 🤩ׄ ׁ 𔔁 ֪ 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ࣪˖ ⚔️ ִ ۫ 𝂅 ྀི۫ ꒰ 🖼 ꒱ - Добрый день всем! Как вы там сейчас? Честно я немного подустал от вчерашних тренерок. Хотя я раньше не так сильно уставал и оставлись ещё хоть какие-то силы... Видно раслабился сильно.. ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ –ммм... Как думаете может вернуться в Бризвил? Всë равно тиксы нужны, а у меня всего 10 штук осталось.. ꒰ ˚ ₊ 🧽 ・┈ · ┈ 🌸 ┈ · ┈ ・ 🧽 ° ₊ ꒱
🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sw0rd_0f_Time. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌟-у меня появилась идея пересоздать канал... вы как думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 90,040 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘽𝙩 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙡𝙤𝙜” (@Sw0rd_0f_Time), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sw0rd_0f_Time.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.