Das Menschengemachte habe ich mir irgendwie anders vorgestellt. 🤔

Channel
⏩ Sven Lingreen (Ex-BuVo IIII) ⏪
@SvenOHV
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
225subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001347569810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SvenOHV |
| Created | 8 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SvenOHV |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 225 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 222 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 222 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.0%
- avg views ÷ 225 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 67.6
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,352 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚢 Rhein-Alarm ohne Rückblick: Was die Bilder von 1949 zeigen! 🌡 Monatelange Trockenheit machte den Rhein schon 1949 schwer befahrbar. Sandbänke lagen frei, Kähne saßen auf Grund, Ladungen wurden halbiert. 🔎 Das zeigt: Extreme Wetterlagen gab es auch früher. ❌ Pegel- und Hitzewarnungen können schützen. Doch Alarm ohne historischen Kontext verengt die Debatte. ✅ dieBasis NRW steht für Achtsamkeit, freie Diskussion …
‼️‼️ Microsoft gibt bei Win 10 klein bei ‼️‼️ Der Umstieg der Nutzer von Windows 10 auf Windows 11 läuft offenbar schleppend. Die Kritik an den massiven Eingriffen in unsere Privatsphäre durch z. B. die ständigen Screenshots auch von privatesten Informationen unter Win 11, hat offenbar viele Nutzer zum Nachdenken gebracht, ob es andere Alternativen für mehr Privatheit gibt. Viele Bundesländer und europäische Staate…
🟩💙🟥🧡 📣 dieBasis News 📣 💚🟦❤️🟧 Ganz typisch für dieBasis, dennoch oder deshalb wirksam und kraftvoll: Hier eine Abfrage, wer in Sachsen-Anhalt relativ spontan bis zur Landtagswahl am 6. September unterstützen würde? Bitte bei der Umfrage (👉 https://t.me/diebasisSachsAn/39601) mitmachen und gerne auch dazu Impulse geben... Die Abfrage ist zunächst für einen organisierten Flash- oder Smart Mob. Wer flyern kann, Plakat…
Wahlkampf braucht Sichtbarkeit – und dafür brauchen wir euch! Der Landesverband Sachsen-Anhalt der dieBasis tritt zur Landtagswahl am 06.09.2026 an. Unsere Inhalte stehen – jetzt müssen sie gesehen, geteilt und diskutiert werden. Unsere Social-Media-Kanäle brauchen mehr Leben: Kommentare, Fragen, Zustimmung, Kritik, eigene Gedanken. Nicht künstlich, nicht als Spam – sondern ehrlich, sichtbar und basisdemokratisch. …
„Gute und schlechte Opfer": Michael Kyrath rechnet im NIUS-Interview ab ... https://youtube.com/watch?v=w8isw692SXU&is=APgCGY-87mwuOBBV
So kann man auch das Recht auf ein analoges Leben nochmal klar machen.
Noch Fragen?
20.07.2026 - OBERHAVEL-STEHT-AUF - (In Oranienburg) Alle Menschen sind bei uns herzlichst Willkommen! Um gemeinsam für Frieden, Freiheit, Selbstbestimmung, Wahrheit und Gerechtigkeit, aufzustehen. Liebe Grüße "Einer von Euch" !!! SCHILDER-DEMO !!! Vom 13.07. bis 17.08.2026 Immer von 16 - 18:00 Uhr Videoübersicht: 00:00 Min. - Einblicke in die Schilder-Demo 01:25 Min. - Matze und Chris, Infos 01:57 Min. - Rede von…
Video, posted without a caption
https://vera-lengsfeld.de/2026/07/18/kinder-ohne-herkunft-was-bei-leihmuttervertraegen-geschieht/ Wenn ich es richtig verstanden habe, ist der Leihmuttervertrag aus dem Ausland eigentlich in Deutschland nichtig. Das "Bestellkind" käme in die Obhut des Jugendamtes und müsste über ein Adoptionsverfahren Eltern erhalten... Na, da bin ich ja gespannt auf die beliebte und zwangsbezahlte tagesschau, ob sie über eine solc…
Werden die aktuell "prominenten" Babys von Spahn oder Streek vom Jugendamt abgeholt, weil die Leihmutterschaft illegal ist?
- Ja, der Rechtsstaat wird hart durchziehen!0%
- Nein, natürlich nicht bei Politikern73%
- Ich vertrau' der tagesschau, die werden das schon einordnen7%
- Wenn Maskendealer und Kinderkäufer ungestraft davon kommen, verliere ich restlos das Vertrauen...53%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SvenOHV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Werden die aktuell "prominenten" Babys von Spahn oder Streek vom Jugendamt abgeholt, weil die Leihmutterschaft illegal ist?
- Ja, der Rechtsstaat wird hart durchziehen!0%
- Nein, natürlich nicht bei Politikern73%
- Ich vertrau' der tagesschau, die werden das schon einordnen7%
- Wenn Maskendealer und Kinderkäufer ungestraft davon kommen, verliere ich restlos das Vertrauen...53%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 252,218 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⏩ Sven Lingreen (Ex-BuVo IIII) ⏪” (@SvenOHV), 225 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SvenOHV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.