Посетила мысль, что мало обсуждают скинамаринк. Это, по сути, американский артхаус хоррора. Американцы лучше всего прощупали жанр. Боже, дай мне аудиторию, с кем разгонять такое

Channel
House of Svekolsky
@Svekolsky_CG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001734972522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Svekolsky_CG |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Svekolsky_CG |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 93 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 92 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 91 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 91 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 2 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 22s
- Average length
- 2m 22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 70 | 64.2% | |
| custom 5399888628358855518 | 17 | 15.6% | |
| custom 5240275871134129747 | 6 | 5.50% | |
| custom 5391042881219731337 | 6 | 5.50% | |
| custom 5470139003237835974 | 6 | 5.50% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| custom 6109476148314377193 | 1 | 0.917% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Svekolsky_CG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 October 2025 to 17 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Ну ка, посмотри, к чему мы с командой руку приложили https://youtu.be/p--xk9n1eIM?is=F-ZEuUwdHk2KBBcW
custom 53998886283588555184custom 54701390032378359743❤🔥2
Obsession (2026) Такое время, молодых режиссеров, как раньше было с тем же Бибером, находят на ютубе и швыряют им деньги за успехи в блогерстве. Вот Обсессия получилась от молодого комика (моложе меня 🤯), который успел сделать полный метр для ютуба "Milk & Serial" (кстати, ничего такой). Тут, правда, швырнули совсем немного, но это и здорово. Хоррор, отличный вход для маленьких бюджетов и креатива. Вот за что я люб…
❤🔥5
Lee Cronin's The Mummy (2026) Еще одна картина отправляется в копилку хороших хорроров 26 года. Брутально, и по олдскульному блевотно. Будто фильм вышел из 00х, а снимали под веянием старой французской волны. Местами дурацкий, придется свыкнуться с условностями. Но как же снят, как смакует мерзость в кадре. #РЕК
❤🔥4
Undertone (2025) Наконец то возвращаюсь с интересными хоррами. Любопытное инди с двумя актерами (а фактически одним), благодаря или вопреки отсутствию бюджетов, смещает акцент с визуала на звук. Фильм очень скромный, но только не в саунд дизайне. Естественно я буду рекомендовать смотреть такое исключительно в наушниках или с хорошей акустикой. Без скриммеров, по сути классический слоубернер, создает иллюзию документа…
❤🔥7
Simple GIF Maker прила для быстрых созданий гифок из любых видео с простым редактором Что умеет: • Кроп, обрезка, даунскейл видео • Настройки сжатия — классика как в фш + можно запустить превью • AI boost (бета) — нейронное улучшение кадров перед экспортом • FSR апскейлинг (бета) — держит чёткость при ресайзе • Любой FPS — без ограничений сверху После установки, прила погружается в контекст и, при выборе видеофайла …
❤🔥11
На работе вдохновили, попробовал вайбкодинг и для меня, который ни черта не понимает в коде, выглядит как абсолютная магия. Собрал себе приложение по нужде, чтобы можно было быстро и просто создавать гифки для тритментов и показов клиенту апдейтов по работе. Особый кайф, что этим я реально стал пользоваться. Поэтому делюсь с тобой, вдруг у тебя тоже был похожий запрос! Если у тебя будут пожелания или что то поломаетс…
❤🔥5
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52402758711341297472
Как же решает режиссура Имея схожие бюджеты и возможности, мы видим контрастный результат. То есть, ты видишь, на уровне современности, очень хорошую графику, с классными материалами, светом, в которые ты можешь поверить. Но не покидает чувство зловещей долины, даже с животными, которые мы никогда не видели в реальности. Почему? Да тут вся специфика в том, как тебе рассказывают историю. Создатели документалки от appl…
❤🔥2custom 61094761483143771931
Неожиданно (относительно) для себя оказался участником нового фильма "Левша" Вовы Беседина. Артдирил одну из сцен со спецэффектами. Сам еще не видел, в кино только вышло, но стимпанк в дореволюционной России вызывает неподдельный интерес. Будто что то из детства, как wild wild west 1999 года.
❤🔥4
Фиинальный трейлер «Левши»! В кино с 22 января! #левша
custom 53998886283588555182❤🔥1
Пора подвести итоги 2025 года моего путешествия по кино. Леттербокс любезно напомнил, что любовь к поиску классных хорроров не утихла. Но год стал послабее, 152 насмотренных фильма и даже 9 рецензий. Да, я стал немного записывать свои мысли на площадку. Из главных фаворитов года выделяю по классике платформы 4 фильма: 🏆 Фавориты 🏆 Adolescence Final Destination Bloodlines Together Sirāt Это мое зе бест, что умещается …
❤🔥5custom 53998886283588555183🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Svekolsky_CG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“House of Svekolsky” (@Svekolsky_CG), 93 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Svekolsky_CG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.