Jom Masuk Livetrade + Education 🔴 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9BYp16fhVj8-cDRNM/

Channel
BOSSDIN LIVETRADE
@BossdinLiveTrade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,335subscribers
-442 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001736624727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BossdinLiveTrade |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BossdinLiveTrade |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 9,335 | -39 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 9,374 | -98 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 9,472 | -21 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 9,493 | -34 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 9,527 | -42 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 9,569 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 9,586 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 9,615 | -39 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 9,654 | -23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 9,677 | -20 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 9,697 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 9,717 | -30 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 9,747 | -29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 9,776 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 9,777 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 9,777 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
108 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 44 | 40.7% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 38.9% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 13.9% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 4.63% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Target News CPI malam ni❓
- Confirm Pacakkk 📈63%
- Saya Target Gold Junam 📉42%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍3❤2🎉2
Video message, posted without a caption
👍2
Salam semua sekarang saya akan aktif di channel baru ya. yang belum masuk lagi boleh masuk sekarang 👇 https://t.me/BidiScalperIndicator https://t.me/BidiScalperIndicator https://t.me/BidiScalperIndicator
👍2
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS96sYhUMB2hJ-me2Gj/
👍1
Jom lepak dalam live ! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS96pW93YqtEp-1s6k4/
👍3
Assalammualaikum semua 👊🏻 Korang dah ready nak rebut slot VIP CLUB ? Mungkin lepasni Bossdin tak bukak dah intake untuk korang dalam ni 👀 Tekan link kat bawah sekarang ❗️ SLOT VIP CLUB SLOT VIP CLUB SLOT VIP CLUB
👍2
Jom geng kita layan live setup santai-santai ! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS96q8Whw8xHP-vIy9G/
👍3
BOSSDINxWHA VIP CLUB LAUNCHING TOMORROW 🆕 Masa yang ditunggu telah tiba! Esok adalah hari launching group community dan VIP yang baru. Dalam community kita, korang akan terima banyak Privileges & Benefits yang boleh membantu korang dalam journey untuk menjadi seorang profitable trader 💯 So korang standby dalam channel pukul 5pm esok guys, slot adalah terhad ! #BOSSDINxWHA
👍2❤1
Korang ready dah ?
🔥5❤1👍1😍1
Assalammualaikum & Good Morning 🔥 Korang dah ready Bossdin nak announce and share “Barang Baek” dengan korang ? 👀 Tapi sebelum apa-apa Bossdin doakan harini semua urusan kita dipermudahkan 👊🏻 Standby, pastikan korang dah Unmute & Pin channel Bossdin ni ! #BossdinLivetrade
❤3🔥3👍2
Jom jumpa dalam live ! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS96Q23BVYvMm-JD4VS/
🔥3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BossdinLiveTrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Target News CPI malam ni❓
- Confirm Pacakkk 📈63%
- Saya Target Gold Junam 📉42%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@portsignalzick · 28,997
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
@hrgms · 55,646
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 21 September 2026
@dollahgbsii · 43,220
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
@xauoderblock · 19,575
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 October 2026
@BookmapAtif · 42,331
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
@asepSuperIndicator · 25,818
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 September 2026
@SoodLayer2024 · 36,008
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
@FlipOrFlopHans · 21,590
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
@heatmapscalpingg · 40,188
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
@alonggoldscalper · 79,209
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@tapaufx1 · 30,696
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
@Sup3rScalping · 25,044
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
@achikM5 · 32,307
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
@FokiyoksMovement · 79,204
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@CaptainArries · 22,904
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 September 2026
@robysultangoldflip · 26,279
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
@jamalnusantara · 37,045
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
@DuanTradersMYR · 21,887
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 September 2026
@DimasTraderCapital · 26,510
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 September 2026
@zikhhentakmarket · 32,507
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
@MarinazTradesXau · 793
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
@sekolahtokusop · 19,607
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 30 September 2026
@hafimyrlayer · 73,791
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@killerpipss · 29,443
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BOSSDIN LIVETRADE” (@BossdinLiveTrade), 9,335 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BossdinLiveTrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.