Channel
@Sunny_Glade999
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002221159341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sunny_Glade999 |
| Description | Ⳅⲇⲣⲁⲃⲥⲧⲃⲩύⲧⲉ! Ⳙ ⲇⲟⳝⲣⲟ ⲡⲟⲯⲁⲗⲟⲃⲁⲧь! ^^ Ⲁⲣⲧ ⲏⲁ ⲁⲃⲁⲧⲁⲣⲕⲉ- @Neeeeriii Ⲙⲟя ⲡⲟⲃⲥⲉⲇⲏⲉⲃⲕⲁ- https://t.me/lifestail2010 Ⲥⲟⲟⳝⳃⲉⲥⲧⲃⲟ ⲃ ⲃⲕ- https://vk.com/sunny_clade Ⲥⲥыⲗⲕυ ⲏⲁ ⲕⲟⲙυⲕⲥ: Ⲁⲕⲟⲙυⲕⲥ- https://acomics.ru/~STIP Вк: https://vk.com/s.t.i.p_club |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sunny_Glade999 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 30 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 30 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
46 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 20 | 43.5% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 34.8% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 8.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sunny_Glade999. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 January 2026 to 7 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
— можете меня поздравить, я впервые за долгое время нарисовала более менее готовый арт. Просто.. в последнее время стало как-то тяжелее рисовать чисто для себя(по этой причине и комикс пока приостановлен). Надеюсь, это состояние пройдёт с окончанием учебного года
❤3❤🔥2🍌1💘1
— Чтож.. ладно. Со скелетом я решила немного повременить. И вместо него я сшила такого котейку. Его, кстати, мракобесик зовут. Буду носить как брелок
❤3🍌1💘1
– кстати! Раз уж речь пошла о куклах, то я уже продумала, что будет следующим.. нашего и материалов надо немного, и будет плюс опыту. Думаю.. самое сложное будет сделать тело, ведь оно включает проволку.. ну ничего! Справлюсь! У меня ещё по планам сделать шута, но для него, как мне кажется, понадобится много чего
❤1🌭1💘1
—... так.. доброе время суток.. и я опять страдаю какой-то фигней! Вплане.. мне было нечего делать, и я решила что-нибудь связать.. и получилось это чудо-юдо. И да, одежду я ей уже сшила, у меня раньше был в этом опыт. И, считай, у меня на эту няшу ушла добрая неделя страданий.. и мне она очень нравится, только теперь я не знаю, куда её девать.
❤1🌭1💘1
— Добрый вечер в хату! И короче! В последнее время я опять немного подзабросила рисование, но зато хочу поделиться последними скетчами, так как очень ими горжусь. И по сути.. я недавно думала насчёт того, чтобы попытаться что-нибудь сделать на рпг мейкере. Пока только тщетно пытаюсь разобраться в программе. И помимо этого подумала насчёт того, кого хотела бы сделать главным гг игры, если бы вцелом могла эту игру сдел…
❤1🍌1💘1
— и да, этот скетчик очень грязный.. но почему и нет? (Если что, имя у неё Яра, если кто не разобрал)
💘1
— Кто сможет отгадать, из какого произведения эта пуся? Вот вам даже имя в предачу, чтобы легче было
🍌1💘1
— Ну окей! Почему бы и нет? К тому, в последнее время я стала много читать.. ну.. среднестатистически много. И за это время я нарисовала лишь один скетч, посвящённый своему чтению.. ща покажу!
💘2
— Да-да. Считай, все то время, что меня не было, я почти не рисовала, за исключением работ для художки
— Эм.. ну.. тут такое дело.. Я неожиданно вспомнила, что умею рисовать, и то что мне надо вести канал.. Как-то неловко вышло..
💘2
– добрый день! И глядите, какую красоту я нарисовала! Просто я сейчас на больничном, и мне под руку как раз попался небольшой холстик. И по правде говоря, то одна одна из немногих картин, которую я нарисовала красками(не считая работ из художки). Как вам?
❤5💘1
— Кстати, я подумываю насчёт того, чтобы снять на это скетчбук обзор. Почему бы и нет? К тому, большую часть скетчбука я не показывала. Что думаете насчёт этого?
🔥2💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Sunny_Glade999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,230,976 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✿ Ⲋυⲛⲛⲩ Ⳓⳑⲁⲇⲉ ✿” (@Sunny_Glade999), 30 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sunny_Glade999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.