Imam an-Nawawis Handschrift
❤9

Channel
@SunnaGermany
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
227subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002453674609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SunnaGermany |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SunnaGermany |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 227 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 223 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 222 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 222 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 369 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
25 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Imam an-Nawawis Handschrift
❤9
وتقدس أن يكون في الأرض ولا في السماء وجل عن ذلك علواً كبيراً Abū Nuʿaym al-Iṣfahānī (336-430 n.H) überliefert von ʿAmr ibn ʿUṯmān al-Makkī (?-291 n.H) der sagt: „Und Er ist geheiligt darüber, in der Erde oder im Himmel zu sein; hoch erhaben ist Er über all dies.“ Ḥilyat al-Awliyāʾ von Abū Nuʿaym al-Iṣfahānī 336-430 n.H (10/292) Ich sage (Sultan Ahmet al-Māturīdī) die Überlieferungskette bis zu ʿAmr ibn ʿUṯmān al-M…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
٩١٨٦- إذا قال : بين يدى الله تعالى، فقد قال بعض مشايخنا رحمهم الله تعالى : إن هذا اللفظ لا يجوز، وقال بعضهم : يجوز، وقد ذكر الخصاف في أدب القاضي حديث على رضی الله تعالى عنه : أنه قال : سمعت رسول الله ﷺ يقول : ما من قاضي أو وال يؤتى به يوم القيامة حتى يوقف بين يدى الله عز وجل على الصراط وإنه صريح في جواز هذا اللفظ . Burhān al-Dīn al-Buḫārī (551-616 n.H) sagt: Wenn jemand sagt: „vor Allah, dem Erhabenen“, erklärten ei…
❤1
وذكر ابن عيينة أنه قال : كما وصف الله تعالی به نفسه ، فقراءته تفسير فليس لاحد ان يفسره الا الله عز وجل Ibn Fūrak (330–406 n.H) sagt: Imām Sufyān ibn ʿUyayna (107–198 n.H) sagte: „So, wie Allah erhaben ist Er Sich selbst damit beschrieben hat. Seine Rezitation ist seine Erklärung. Daher darf niemand es erklären außer Allah, dem Mächtigen und Erhabenen.“ Muškil al-ḥadīṯ wa-bayānuhu von Abū Bakr Ibn Fūrak 330–406 n.H …
❤1
ثم سألتم عند انتهائنا إلى هذا الموضع من كتابنا، أن نتأمل مصنف الشيخ أبي بكر محمد بن إسحاق بن خزيمة رضي الله عنه، الذي سماه: كتاب التوحيد، وجمع فيه نوع هذه الأخبار التي ذكرت فيها هذه الألفاظ المتشابهة، وحمل ذلك على أنها صفات الله عز وجل، وأنه فيها لا يشبه سائر الموصوفين بها من الخلق. فتأملنا ذلك، وبيّنا ما ذهب فيه عن الصواب في تأويله، وأوهم خلاف الحق في تخريجه، وجمعه بين ما يجوز أن يجري مجرى الصفة وما لا يجوز ذلك فيه.…
❤1
Imām Abū Bakr Ibn Fūrak (330–406 n.H) Kritik an Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq ibn Ḫuzayma (223-311 n.H)
Somit ist bewiesen, dass die Verneinung der Bewegung in Bezug auf Allah den Erhabenen keine Verneinung einer Vollkommenheit ist, sondern vielmehr der absolute Freispruch Seiner selbst von den Eigenschaften physischer Körper. Die Bestätigung der Bewegung für Ihn bedeutet in Wahrheit, Ihm Bedürftigkeit zuzuschreiben, da nur derjenige die Bewegung benötigt, der sein Ziel nicht anders als durch sie erreicht. Was Allah de…
❤3
Er erschafft sie in Seiner Schöpfung, wann Er will und wie Er will, ohne dass Er selbst mit Bewegung beschrieben wird, weil die Bewegung keine Eigenschaft reiner Vollkommenheit ist, sondern zu den Besonderheiten physischer Körper gehört. Die Falschheit der Analogie Hieraus zeigt sich die Verderbtheit ihrer Aussage: "Wenn das Bewegliche vollkommener ist als das Ruhende, so hat der Schöpfer ein größeres Anrecht auf d…
❤2
Die Verneinung der Bewegung (Harakah) bezüglich Allah, dem Erhabenen Die fehlerhafte Grundlage der Anthropomorphisten Eine der größten Grundlagen der Mushabbiha (Anthropomorphisten), die sie in den Tajsim (Verkörperlichung) stürzen ließ, ist, dass sie den Schöpfer mit dem Geschöpf verglichen haben. Sie machten das, was in Bezug auf das Kontingente (Mögliche) eine Vollkommenheit darstellt, zu einer Vollkommenheit in…
❤2
Das Bittgebet was befohlen wurde zu lesen: «لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ الْعَظِيمُ الْحَلِيمُ، لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ رَبُّ الْعَرْشِ الْعَظِيمِ، لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ رَبُّ السَّمَوَاتِ وَرَبُّ الأَرْضِ وَرَبُّ الْعَرْشِ الْكَرِيمِ». lā ilāha illā allāh al-ʿaẓīm al-ḥalīm, lā ilāha illā allāh rabb al-ʿarsh al-ʿaẓīm, lā ilāha illā allāh rabb al-samawāti wa-rabb al-arḍi wa-rabb al-ʿarsh al-karīm Es gibt keinen …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SunnaGermany. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 651,727 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔻 Ahl as-Sunna Germany” (@SunnaGermany), 227 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SunnaGermany.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.