Channel
@Suninthefog7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
475subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002699430558 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Suninthefog7 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Suninthefog7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 475 | +3 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 04:22 | 472 | no change |
| 8 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 472 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 30 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (30 September 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,046 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
نابغه های مورد علاقم که جا موندن : https://t.me/sebszone https://t.me/midnightinparisss https://t.me/haha678901 https://t.me/aetvara https://t.me/Suninthefog7 https://t.me/Kaizodaily https://t.me/harmonyofwindandtree
هدف اینه که : فولدری داشته باشیم که ادمین های باهوشی دارن و مخاطب هایی که متقابلا نرد و نابغه هستن 📚🫵🏼 . Nerds & Writers ← Click here!!
me n who?
00:25
#فوری‼️(هشدار عکسای دلخراش) بچه ها یه بچه گربه کوچولو فوری به کمکتون نیاز داره این کوچولو که اگهیشو برامون فرستادن گفتن که چشماش به خاطر بیماری هرپس اینطوری شده و چندین روز هم انواع و اقسام دارو و قطره گرفته ولی گویا به هر دلیلی بوده حالا یا خودش دست الودشو همش به چشمش زده یا هرچیزی جواب نداده متاسفانه و باید تخلیه بشه و عفونت شدید داره همچنان که ممکنه به مغزش بزنه و پر بکشه ممکنه دست به دست هم بدیم کمکش کنیم بتونن چ…
«در بابِ دانش و پرسشِ باید» علم مدام چیزهایی رو کشف می‌کنه که تا دیروز نمی‌دونستیم حتی وجود دارن. ولی داستان همیشه این چرخه‌ی تکراری کشف نیست؛ چون پشت هر مسئلهی علمی، مسائل فلسفی و اخلاقی هم مطرحه. البته که علم می‌تونه بدون اخلاق هم پیش بره؛ اما خب تا کجا و تا چه حد؟ مثلا توی پژوهش حیوانی، علم می‌پرسه چه چیزی ممکنه و چه چیزی می‌تونه به شناخت یا درمان کمک کنه. ولی پرسش دیگه‌ای هم وجود داره؛ از منظر اخلاق: "آیا رسید…
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
برای همین، پاسداری از زبان فقط مسئلهی اصالت نیست. گرچه خود اصالت زبان برای من ارزشمنده، ولی فکر می‌کنم ارزش پارسی فقط در "پارسی بودن" اون خلاصه نمی‌شه. ارزشش در تمام چیزهاییه که در خودش نگه داشته؛ واژه‌ها، ریشه‌ها، ظرافت‌ها، خاطره‌ها و نگاه‌هایی که نسل‌های پیش از ما با این زبان ساخته و به ما رسوندن. وقتی واژه‌ای رو که قرن‌ها در پارسی زیسته، به راحتی کنار می‌ذاریم و با یک واژه‌ی آماده جایگزینش می‌کنیم، فقط یک واژه رو…
از طرفی، توی دنیایی که توجه ما دائماً تکه‌تکه میشه، واژه‌های کوتاه و برچسب‌های آماده وسوسه‌کننده‌ترن. گفتن «تاکسیکه» خیلی راحت‌تر از توضیح دقیق رفتاریه که آزارت داده. اما اگه همیشه کوتاه‌ترین راه رو انتخاب کنیم، فقط جمله‌هامون کوتاه نمی‌شن؛ تفاوت‌های جهان هم برامون کم‌رنگ می‌شن. به قول ویتگنشتاین: «مرزهای زبان من، مرزهای جهان من است.» هرچه توانایی بیشتری برای نام‌گذاری و تمایزگذاری داشته باشیم، بخش‌های بیشتری از تجر…
می‌دونین مسئله دیگه فقط این نیست که چه واژه‌ای رو به کار می‌بریم؛ مسئله اینه که با واژه‌هامون چه چیزهایی رو می‌تونیم ببینیم. وقتی چند تجربه‌ی متفاوت رو با یه واژه توصیف می‌کنیم، کم‌کم مرز معنایی بین اون‌ها محو میشه. به این "فرسایش معنایی" گفته میشه. فرایندی که طی اون، یک واژه اون‌قدر گسترده میشه که تفاوت‌های میان چند تجربه یا مفهوم رو در خودش حل می‌کنه و باعث میشه تمایزهاشون رو کمتر ببینیم. مثلا وقتی "تاکسیک" رو …
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Suninthefog7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خورشید در مه” (@Suninthefog7), 475 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Suninthefog7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.