Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sue Nature & Love ❤️

Channel

Sue Nature & Love ❤️

@SueNatureandLove

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

213subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001454554284
TypeChannel
Username@SueNatureandLove
Created6 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SueNatureandLove

Previous handles

@SueNatureandLove was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@SueArtandLove
held 7 August 20267 August 2026

Growth

210213211.56 August 2026 — 210 subscribers7 August 2026 — 210 subscribers13 August 2026 — 212 subscribers20 August 2026 — 211 subscribers3 September 2026 — 210 subscribers5 September 2026 — 213 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 210–213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 00:01213+3
3 Sept 2026, 10:15210-1
20 Aug 2026, 01:21211-1
13 Aug 2026, 07:45212+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:45210no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:53210first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.8%
avg views ÷ 213 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held37 (18 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total2,715
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 59s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC24 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @diesprachedergoetterPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

1 Sept 2026, 05:29 UTC55 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

Auf meinen Spaziergängen hab ich so einen tollen Baum entdeckt.

1 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC54 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Bäume können weit mehr als wir glauben und müssen nicht immer sofort gefällt werden. https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dcp3zcAOTFi/?igsi=NG1waTg4MHZqd2ls

1 Sept 2026, 05:16 UTC56 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Lyrik_poesiePhoto

Ihr wurdet zusammen geboren, und ihr werdet auf immer zusammen sein. Ihr werdet zusammen sein, wenn die weissen Flügel des Todes eure Tage scheiden. Ja, ihr werdet selbst im stummen Gedenken Gottes zusammen sein. Aber lasst Raum zwischen euch. Und lasst die Winde des Himmels zwischen euch tanzen. Liebt einander, aber macht die Liebe nicht zur Fessel: Lasst sie eher ein wogendes Meer zwischen den Ufern eurer Seelen

1 Sept 2026, 04:13 UTC387 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

Schweine sind so intelligent und haben so viel Gefühl! Was machen wir hier bloß? Die Menschheit ist geisteskrank! https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcsZK0bNgYd/?igsi=MWswc2ZlNjMyMmZ5MQ==

31 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC119 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

Spitze! 👍 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dcq51_KsB-_/?igsi=cW82Zmhxa2Q2MjZx

31 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC58 viewsread 3 September 2026

Danke an alle, die das Thema der Nutztiere ernst nehmen, es sich anschauen und verbreiten! Die Tiere brauchen unsere Stimme und unser NEIN! zu Tierausbeutung. 👇

29 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC475 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

Statement einer Tierärztin zum neuen Film von Team Tierschutz "Unter Schweinen". https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcoPkQht1nu/?igsi=MW1hb2RiZ3NkZXlkaw==

29 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC78 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @tierleidfreielebensmittelPhoto

🩸🐄🐖🐓🐑🩸 Dieses Zitat macht unmissverständlich klar: „Gewalt ist eine Energie, die keine Artgrenzen kennt!“ Wer Tierleid fördert und Tierleidprodukte konsumiert, nährt genau die Frequenz von Zerstörung, die wir im Außen so oft beklagen – und kann keinen Frieden ernten. Wahre Friedfertigkeit beginnt nicht an fernen Verhandlungstischen, sondern in unseren Gedanken und auf unseren Tellern. Wer den Frieden im Großen

29 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC75 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @QPLUSPLUSPLUS_NEWSVideo

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ Unterirdische Landwirtschaft für Menschen. ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ Ich denke, wenn das beseelte Menschen sehen würden, würden sie vor Schock tot umfallen. Also für mich wäre so was untertäglich. Alleine das was man hört ist grausam. Unvorstellbar. Netzfund 🆕Bleib auf dem Laufenden🆕 https://t.me/QPLUSPLUSPLUS_NEWS

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @SueNatureandLove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sue Nature & Love ❤️” (@SueNatureandLove), 213 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SueNatureandLove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.