Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SEM (Structural Evil Modeling)

@StructuralEvilModeling

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002094207257
TypeChannel
Username@StructuralEvilModeling
DescriptionHuh?? A different approach to Structural Equations Modeling, Statistical Science, Philosophy, Dark humor, and The Unique Variance.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 19 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/StructuralEvilModeling

Growth

747 August 2026 — 74 subscribers9 August 2026 — 74 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:4674no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:4074first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
27
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

230 reactions across 19 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4117.8%
🔥3515.2%
🤔156.52%
🤝135.65%
👌114.78%
❤‍🔥104.35%
🕊83.48%
🥰83.48%
73.04%
62.61%
👏62.61%
😁62.61%
😈52.17%
😍52.17%
🤯52.17%
🤷52.17%
👀41.74%
💔41.74%
😎41.74%
👻31.30%
17 further kinds2912.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2024 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Feb 2026, 12:16 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

30 Oct 2024, 19:53 UTC≈1,070 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://esoteric.codes/blog/the-128-language-quine-relay

🤔6🔥2🤨21

30 Aug 2024, 17:38 UTC409 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @phimulambda

The problem is that coding isn’t fun if all you can do is call things out of a library, if you can’t write the library yourself. If the job of coding is just to be finding the right combination of parameters, that does fairly obvious things, then who’d want to go into that as a career? Donald Knuth in an interview with Peter Seibel. Unfortunately, the answer Knuth would get today is: everybody.

🔥53💯21💅1🥰1

4 Aug 2024, 00:24 UTC453 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤔4😎41💔1😢1

29 Jul 2024, 14:17 UTC≈1,190 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤷5😁3😈2👀1🔥1🤔1

26 Jul 2024, 22:48 UTC446 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Artist and . . . You can guess which one it would be! ;)

🔥5👍3🤯3

26 Jul 2024, 22:46 UTC365 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🧿 Recently, we've been too busy with a significant project... Stay tuned, as we will be sharing more details soon. 😈 @StructuralEvilModeling

❤‍🔥6🔥42👍2🫡2🐳1💔1

18 Jun 2024, 14:51 UTC382 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @datastorieslanguages

​​ChatGPT is bullshit https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5 Я так и не понял, что в этой статье нового, но название порадовало. #datascience

👻3🌚2😁21👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StructuralEvilModeling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEM (Structural Evil Modeling)” (@StructuralEvilModeling), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StructuralEvilModeling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.