Video, posted without a caption
💩9🤬7❤2

Channel
@StrippiesAnnouncment
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
124subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001776780996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StrippiesAnnouncment |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 1 March 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StrippiesAnnouncment |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 124 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 125 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 126 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 128 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 129 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 130 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 131 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 131 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
232 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 84 | 36.2% | |
| 👎 | 45 | 19.4% | |
| 💩 | 41 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 11.6% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 9.91% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 3.02% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.862% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.862% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.431% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2022 to 8 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
💩9🤬7❤2
✅ KYC & Audit ✅ Doxed for the community ✅ Aimed to resolve: 🐳 Easit incorporates Limit orders, Stop loss, Take profit, Trail profit, and our innovative function Take Initials What is the "Take Initials" function, and how does it works❔ How do "Take Initials" work? We all know how hard it is to get your initial investments at a point. Price impact percentages apply, accompanied by the initial taxes often result in …
👍6❤1
Till the dev of our project comes back, this project will do really well, The dev is hard working for this project. Last call i made on Cashcow did 30x.
💩11👍3
DeFi Yield Staking/Farming Protocol Hidden Gem Found. Big Boys are backing this solid project. This will be hotter than Drip Network https://t.me/cashprinters
💩8👍2
But if we do it might mostly just be strippers. But Read the previous announcement
❤9👎6💩5👍3
We finished migrating to BSC. We are gonna launch the token on Friday, 7pm GMT. Gonna do a fair launch before the actual launch. We are delaying it until Friday because we are doing heavy testing every day to avoid the disaster that we all went through with Fantom. Get your BNB ready, guys! LFG! 🚀
👍9💩4👎1
Would u guys rather want a 30-50x launch where no one gets airdrops but everyone get a fair chance to buy a hugee bag of strippies or -100% Launch by giving everyone Airdrops! Just by the looks of it, 2-3million SGOLD has to be airdropped!
💩4🤔2
Ok so as per the members of this community. Everyone wants a airdrop to thier wallets whoever held on ftm. Ok so we add Liquidity and we send airdrops! Do you guys really think it's gonna go somewhere? Logically no , People sell it off which exceeds the buy pressure than the sell pressure, And Before everyone sells boom! The Liquidity is drained by all the people!. Project fail before it even started. Hence the bs…
👍1
Hello guys! Hugee Announcement soon!
🔥17👍4🤯2
Clearing the fact! If you have strippers, we will try our best to Evaluate according to price and the avg bought at and airdrop SGOLD equalling the Amount!
👍13❤5
Strippies Garden: You might have seen funds removed! A big announcement to be made regarding this! We have decided to relaunch on BSC due to shitty ftm network. The funds taken out now will be airdropped to your wallets on bsc Strippies never die! After consideration to community, We will be migrating to BSC, Since we think it's better for us and you! Whatever you guys have in wallets will be snapshot and Airdrop…
👍18❤4
If we relaunch on BSC, we'll probably do another presale (public this time) and think about how to compensate people. We'll lyk. Stay tuned. And we want to relaunch.
👍20👎3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StrippiesAnnouncment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@StrippiesAnnouncment named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Strippies Club Announcement” (@StrippiesAnnouncment), 124 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StrippiesAnnouncment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.