Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NewJeans: Stripe of Cruelty.

@StripeJeans

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

125subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649307361
TypeChannel
Username@StripeJeans
DescriptionMyriad a wide range o' pursuits they can involved and hurdles they should encounter. In spite concerning everything, @StripeJeansbot will immediately begin to maintain surveillance on o'er @SwindleSheet imprisonment hallway, which houses lawbreakers.
Created7 April 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/StripeJeans

Growth

1257 August 2026 — 125 subscribers9 August 2026 — 125 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124–126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 02:33125no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:18125first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

204 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6833.3%
❤‍🔥6230.4%
167.84%
👾125.88%
💯115.39%
🔥115.39%
😍83.92%
🥰83.92%
🏆41.96%
🕊41.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2023 to 9 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2024, 11:15 UTCviews —

NewJeans: Stripe of Cruelty. pinned «︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ <⚔️> Salient earth-dwellers: with this missive clutching a glimpse of yours, may us beseech for your abet to onward this street almighty to your channel. VOL. II—’ [..] THE CORE OF HATRED. ⸸ ﹙Atrocity…»

9 Feb 2024, 11:15 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 9 August 2026

︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ <⚔️> Salient earth-dwellers: with this missive clutching a glimpse of yours, may us beseech for your abet to onward this street almighty to your channel. VOL. II—’ [..] THE CORE OF HATRED. ⸸ ﹙Atrocity & Malignity . . . 💀 𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙄𝙋𝙀𝙅𝙀𝘼𝙉𝙎: Chamber of defiant magnanimity scandalous acquire mislaid some of their accross the street. We assume audacious seeing that sum of

3 May 2023, 13:05 UTCviews —

NewJeans: Stripe of Cruelty. pinned «<💀> Salient earth-dwellers: with this missive clutching a glimpse of yours, may us beseech for your abet to onward this street almighty to your channel. STRIPEJEANS: Chamber of defiant magnanimity scandalous acquire mislaid some of their accross the street.…»

3 May 2023, 13:05 UTC≈2,530 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026

<💀> Salient earth-dwellers: with this missive clutching a glimpse of yours, may us beseech for your abet to onward this street almighty to your channel. STRIPEJEANS: Chamber of defiant magnanimity scandalous acquire mislaid some of their accross the street. We assume audacious seeing that sum of our members chastice us for indifferent heedless sacrifice. Mystical luminous devoir sanctify us whereas establish our eve

❤‍🔥114🥰3💯2👾1

30 Apr 2023, 07:30 UTC702 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥115💯5😍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @StripeJeans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,052,638 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NewJeans: Stripe of Cruelty.” (@StripeJeans), 125 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StripeJeans.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.