Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

HIATUS.

@Strawblemaker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001288233905
TypeChannel
Username@Strawblemaker
Descriptionˏˋ°•*⁀➷ ㅤ≭•۟. 𝐀ny question or business inquiry? ㅤ @strawblemakerbot ㅤ≭•۟. 𝐒ince 30 𝐉une 2020 ─────────────────
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Strawblemaker

Growth

136 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:3013no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:5413first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 May 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,150
Videos
29
Links
182

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2021, 16:09 UTC406 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

𝐟𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐛𝐥𝐞

30 Jun 2021, 15:19 UTC359 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Another year to create precious memories together, another year to discover new things to enjoy about each other. And here’s another year pf laughing together, messing up together and making it together. Happy anniversary a place i will always call 𝗛𝗢𝗠𝗘!

30 Jun 2021, 14:55 UTC248 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @VkyrellPhoto

ㅤㅤAnother year of sharing life's ups and downs together. Happy anniversary homes!

30 Jun 2021, 14:37 UTC230 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @TomHollantPhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝒉𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒊𝒗, 𝒎𝒚 𝒃𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒂𝒎𝒑. ㅤㅤㅤㅤ

30 Jun 2021, 13:26 UTC178 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLEAUSHIESPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

30 Jun 2021, 13:26 UTC182 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLEAUSHIESPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

30 Jun 2021, 13:26 UTC219 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLEAUSHIES

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝕿o my dearest, 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐖𝐁𝐋𝐄𝐌𝐀𝐊𝐄𝐑. Happy anniversary to us. Finally we counted to our last 12th months since our first met, and now counting to our first year. To me you are such a kind of comrade that hard to find, and it is nearly impossible to describe in words how your existence enriches to my lives. With your presence in my life, my life has illuminated with new hope. You are a miraculous soul who has taught me

30 Jun 2021, 13:03 UTC167 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ𝐇appy Anniversary, hopefully it will ㅤㅤbe a strange family and a laughing ㅤㅤstock. xoxo! ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ

30 Jun 2021, 13:03 UTC174 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @keanaleavingPhoto

❦ ᎒ 𝗛𝗮𝗽𝗽𝘆 𝗔𝗻𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆, 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿. 𝗔𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲!

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Strawblemaker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,076,642 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HIATUS.” (@Strawblemaker), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Strawblemaker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.