Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Storytelling Tools by Innubis

@StorytellingTools

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

259subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263548870
TypeChannel
Username@StorytellingTools
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 10 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/StorytellingTools

Growth

2596 Aug 2026, 13:25 — 259 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:33 — 259 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:257 Aug 2026, 01:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 258–260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:33259no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:25259first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 September 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
43
Videos
3
Links
89

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍360.0%
120.0%
🔥120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2020 to 5 June 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2022, 09:25 UTC≈1,450 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @komikaki

Покуда телеграм остается временным (ничто не вечно) островком стабильности, в качестве альтернативы и параллели фейсбуку паркуюсь тут https://t.me/innubis Тут обо всём: 🧬рисунки и о рисунках: визуальное мышление. 🧬бытие, встречи, активности. 🧬видосы, уроки, полезности, материалы всякоразные от спикерства и лидерства, до темы флибустьерского найма. ❄️на этом другой канал «Storytelling tools» встает на паузу, ибо пока

👍1

6 Apr 2022, 09:43 UTC≈1,440 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Закинул на “спонср” перевод статьи “Индекса интересного” Мюррея Девиса. Полезный набор логических ситуаций, провоцирующих интерес через отрицание устоявшихся шаблонов. Цитата: (vi) Функция То, что кажется феноменом функционирующим неэффективно в качестве средства достижения цели, в действительности является феноменом функционирующим эффективно. Например, заключение Мертона (Merton) о том, что политическая машина, к

🔥1

22 Mar 2022, 08:11 UTC955 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Еще фрагмент лекции по подготовке спикера

👍1

21 Mar 2022, 16:46 UTC862 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Фрагмент лекции по подготовке спикера

21 Mar 2022, 16:10 UTC841 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кратко по базовым причинам страха публичных выступлений, основанно на опыте докладчиков ИТ-конференций. https://youtu.be/rWy5cVJBYok

1

4 Dec 2021, 18:27 UTC841 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

iMovie, как супер-инструмент подготовки к выступлению. Личный опыт. https://youtu.be/YqZSj47o4pU

👍1

13 Jun 2021, 08:38 UTC871 viewsread 7 August 2026

Крутейший пиар-нейминг https://youtu.be/_3b2F-bkAdM

10 Jun 2021, 12:33 UTC705 viewsread 7 August 2026

Краткий шоурил со слайдами для выступления Александра Ларьяновского на TemLeadConf 2021 https://youtu.be/t19e4ACpjIw

19 Apr 2021, 18:12 UTC667 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mnogosdelal

В четверг в 19:00 у нас с Кириллом Анастасиным будет стрим про прогностическое мышление: https://youtu.be/t8xdmiZk4xk

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StorytellingTools. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Storytelling Tools by Innubis” (@StorytellingTools), 259 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StorytellingTools.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.