Channel
@Step_by_step_MaitreX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
591subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001935487775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Step_by_step_MaitreX |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Step_by_step_MaitreX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 591 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 593 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 593 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
265 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 176 | 66.4% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 12.8% | |
| 🤬 | 13 | 4.91% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 4.53% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 3.77% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 3.02% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.377% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2024 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Voici la nouvelle capsule mise en ligne, enregistrée avec Patrick PASIN, auteur et éditeur des ouvrages "L'arme climatique" et "L'arme environnementale" Lien YouTube : https://youtu.be/IFUoTUHOD-I Lien Crowdbunker : https://crowdbunker.com/v/FZ5d4LZBvX
👍9❤3
Voici la liste des canaux et groupes mise à jour
👍5🙏3👌2
fawzikings - "La conspiración HAARP "Diffusé par CBC (VOSTFR) 1996 https://www.youtube.com/@fawzikings2/videos https://odysee.com/@fawzikings:1 ▶️ HAARP Ou La Modification Du Climat ▶️ Guerre météorologique - La technologie de la mort.. ▶️ Et si l'Amérique se préparait à la guerre du climat❓ ▶️ HAARP l'arme qui fait aussi des tremblements de terre.. ▶️ Carte des tremblements de terre en temps réel.. ▶️ Les ar…
❤7👍3
“From CNN: Cloud Seeding has been around since the 1940’s" Oh I thought it didn’t exist? For more forbidden content join bellow: https://t.me/ForbiddenTruthQ The wait is over! GITMO has named the first elite individual to face the harshest judgment. Join now to uncover the truth! https://t.me/GITMOTV ✅️
❤5👍1
60 ans plus tard, vous pensez qu'ils en sont où niveau modification du climat ? 1960 - L'opération Popeye a été utilisée pour induire la pluie et prolonger la saison de la mousson, afin d'appuyer les efforts du gouvernement américain pendant la guerre du Vietnam. L'opération ensemencement de nuages avec de l'iodure d'argent et de l'iodure de plomb, à eu pour conséquence de déclencher la période des moussons dans d…
👍19🔥4
Pour mon épisode n°1dans ce canal, qui parlait de modifications du climat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h5ZBJlUjRg
👍14❤3👏2
Je suis en train d'écrire une étude qui aborde notamment la question des "villes de 15 minutes" Au Canada, une polémique surgit à propos d'une réglementation mise en place Ici, TVA (qui est LA TV main stream québecoise !!!) se met à évoquer des mesures dystopiques... et soudain s'en inquiète... Assisterait-on au réveil (forcé) des médias qui soudain s'aperçoivent que nous n'alertions pas pour rien ?? La séquence com…
🤬11👍5😨1
💥💥CHEMTRAILS – US : LE SÉNAT DE L’ÉTAT DU TENNESSEE A ADOPTÉ UN PROJET DE LOI INTERDISANT LA PULVÉRISATION DE PRODUITS CHIMIQUES DESTINÉS À LA GÉO-INGÉNIERIE DANS LE CIEL💥💥 Un nouveau projet de loi du Tennessee interdit au gouvernement fédéral de se lancer dans des expériences de géo-ingénierie impliquant le rejet de produits chimiques dans le ciel, ou ce que certains pourraient appeler des « chemtrails » 24 sénate…
👍21👏4❤2🤬1
Encore de la neige qui ne fond pas Pour compléter l'un de mes épisodes
Quelque chose d'EXTRÊMEMENT inquiétant est en train de se produire Un couple de montagnards dit : "Hier, il a neigé et il a neigé bizarrement" Ils prennent un chalumeau sur la neige et elle ne fond pas. "Elle brûle mais ne fond pas. C'est comme une fine mousse de polystyrène. À un moment donné, elle a failli "prendre feu, mais elle ne coule pas". @WallStreetApes
😱7🔥5👍2🤬1
Pour compléter l'un de mes épisodes précédents
https://www.acseipica.fr/demande-de-creation-dune-commission-denquete-parlementaire/ Une association demande une commission d'enquête sur les empoisonnements massifs dont nous faisons l'objet depuis tant d'années.. ... vous savez, ce truc qui n'était qu'une théorie de la conspiration ? documents et liens multiples sur cette page
👍19❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Step_by_step_MaitreX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STEP BY STEP” (@Step_by_step_MaitreX), 591 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Step_by_step_MaitreX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.