28 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC52 viewsread 10 August 2026
@Stentyi_193 Отличный селлер, решает все беды Беру много аккаунтов и планирую брать еще больше
Channel
Stent review
@Stent_Bank
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002891598951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Stent_Bank |
| Created | 4 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Stent_Bank |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 51 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 49 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 49 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
14 Mar 2026, 19:56 UTC477 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
27 Oct 2025, 13:38 UTC762 viewsread 10 August 2026
Все гладко и без задержек , банки живут отлично. Советую всем !
6 Aug 2025, 10:39 UTC≈2,140 viewsread 10 August 2026
Покупал аккаунт Tide Business, передача произошла быстро, продавец ввел в курс дела, так как брал аккаунт первый раз. На всем пути использования, обращался к продавцу за советами, не на все вопросы он конечно знает ответы, но по важным пунктам отвечал. Банк неплохой, уже 3 раза запрашивал документы, но проверяли их за 20 минут, что очень приятно. С компанией,директором все окей. На данный момент банк прожил уже - 28к
29 Jul 2025, 16:23 UTC952 viewsread 10 August 2026
Отличный сервис, покупал пейпалы неоднократно. Работает быстро, всегда готов пойти навстречу.
27 Jul 2025, 12:09 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 10 August 2026
++ good work got my redotpay very quick
21 Jul 2025, 11:19 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 10 August 2026
Honest and trustworthy person, patient and he actually knows what he's doing, very understanding seller, i vouch him all the way
17 Jul 2025, 14:17 UTC822 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
17 Jul 2025, 09:13 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 10 August 2026
Все сделал быстро и четко, буквально вчера перед сном дал тз, на утро уже был готовый аккаунт без каких любо проблем. Рекомендую 🤝👍
16 Jul 2025, 22:17 UTC757 viewsread 10 August 2026
Good seller bought few accounts from him, will work with him in future.
16 Jul 2025, 21:54 UTC689 viewsread 10 August 2026
Покупал у Stenta Tide Uk 🇬🇧, все на высшем уровне - быстро , профессионально , без лишней суеты. Рекомендую 👍
16 Jul 2025, 21:54 UTC716 viewsread 10 August 2026
Брал Mercury business, сделал быстро без проблем, от гаранта не отказался, акк живой спустя неделю
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Stent_Bank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 874,056 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stent review” (@Stent_Bank), 51 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stent_Bank.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.