Channel
@StealthEscrowScamResponse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
92subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003033034136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StealthEscrowScamResponse |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 20 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StealthEscrowScamResponse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 92 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 91 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:47 | 91 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 20 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 46.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 11.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2025 to 25 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @StealthEscrowScamResponse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 August 2025 to 25 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Everything I wrote in response to the accusations in that channel was backed with proper proofs and even confirmation from the victim where needed. Let me clarify each case one by one: Case #1 (SMTP): We have clearly stated many times in our community "Stealth Chat" that we don’t do SMTP escrows. However, when I cross-checked this specific case, I found that the seller was never part of our community "Staalth Chat" …
👍4❤2🔥2
Final Confirmation from the victim "Claim Logs" himself!
💯2❤1
I have explained about all the fake report against @stealthescrowbot spreading around with full transparency and proof's attached. We are being framed from our haters and competitors, dragging us down, to grow themselves! — @StealthEscrowbot Team
Claim Logs registered as a buyer with BTC address bc1qlrsjmuxj45vrl04qlyvuydpkd77mlsfwgvf9g9 in the Real Escrow Group of Stealth Escrow Bot and left the group (for whatever reason – maybe account hacked or deliberately). The Escrow address 18H4YnzXgALX4LzRTa3nKTh9trz35CHepP was real and belonged to @Stealthescrowbot. Claim Logs (buyer) sent payment to this escrow wallet. As soon as the payment was received in the es…
In this post, they accuse us that we denied his claims? yes we denied his claims but did we do that without proof's? What should have we done instead ? accept whatever he says knowing its false and even having proof's for the same? Claim logs in the video said "how funds released without him clicking on pay_seller"? Now what if I say that 'pay_seller' never happened in this escrow ? Let me explain that more clearly i…
What do you see in here in this image exactly? Me approving Bendyman because he lost his old account ? It is still not deleted, what would he even gain doing that?
📌
🛑 Clearing the Air — For Transparency’s Sake I’ve been ignoring these fake posts for a while, but now they’re starting to affect our reputation — so it’s time to speak up. We built @StealthEscrowbot with real effort, and now we’re seeing clear signs that CoinXpertBot’s admin is copying features from our bot — while at the same time pushing false accusations against us. In fact, the CoinXpert admin even came to us …
❤5⚡3🔥2💯1
🧩 Coordinated Targeting of @StealthEscrowbot — The CoinXpert Link We’re noticing a pattern that can’t be ignored. Let’s lay it out clearly: ✅ @druggyguy [1192991732] approved multiple users who later stirred drama or false accusations: 📎 (attached screenshots) • @CranberryCH [7744461720] – falsely accused us during the Stripe case involving @dadz4stripe, despite having no role in it. Just another flying monkey wai…
❤4
🔍 Why We Believe @StealthEscrowScam Is Run by Our Competitor Let’s connect the dots: 1️⃣ @ceoXD (admin of CoinxpertBot) has openly said: "I’ve been doing P2P in my friend’s Indian bot..." 📎 (screenshot attached) This clearly shows he's involved with or supports Indian escrow bots. 2️⃣ The scam page @StealthEscrowScam is owned by @ResearchIntech [7678969343] 3️⃣ In our own group, @druggyguy [1192991732] approved @…
StealthEscrowScam? – Truth & Proof pinned «⚠️ Don’t Be Fooled by Fake Channels It’s obvious that @StealthEscrowScam is using fake views, fake reactions, and possibly fake subs to make their posts seem legit. Check the patterns: * View counts jump instantly * Reactions appear in bulk * Timing and…»
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @StealthEscrowScamResponse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“StealthEscrowScam? – Truth & Proof” (@StealthEscrowScamResponse), 92 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StealthEscrowScamResponse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.