Video message, posted without a caption

Channel
Стасик Спортсмен
@StasikSportsman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
143subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001604695058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StasikSportsman |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StasikSportsman |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 143 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 142 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 144 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 144 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 15s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
101 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 39.6% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5780395556526362780 | 8 | 7.92% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 7.92% | |
| custom 5404731191100196381 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5287251092386626340 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.99% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ну все спортсмены, к свадьбе готов, рубашку нашел🗿
👏6custom 54047311911001963815❤4🔥3🤣1
Как же они кайфуют🗿
❤1
Ну это прикол уже какой то🗿
Лагерь у детей, отдыхают🗿
❤3
Ну просто пздц🗿
Все утро названивают хуесосы и спрашивают интересовался ли службой по контракту, блокируешь их один номер звонят с другого🗿
🤣2🗿1
В России не любят Apple А вот я бы взял Apple. У меня айфон есть, еще бы взял но увы, запрещено🗿
❤2🤣2
А вот и вторая приехала с камер видеонаблюдения🗿
❤7🤣1custom 57803955565263627801
Это первая попытка На второй уже отошел четко… в обкладку🗿
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52872510923866263403💩2🤡2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StasikSportsman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@potato_ton · 128,648
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стасик Спортсмен” (@StasikSportsman), 143 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StasikSportsman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.