Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙈𝙍_𝙈𝙊𝙉𝙀𝙔

Channel

𝙈𝙍_𝙈𝙊𝙉𝙀𝙔

@Stars_Rush

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

43,954subscribers

+37,508 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003059451705
TypeChannel
Username@Stars_Rush
DescriptionOwner : @poor_iman
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stars_Rush

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,77959,89632,837.57 August 2026 — 6,446 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,446 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,438 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,389 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,383 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,732 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,734 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,556 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,435 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,378 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,779 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,644 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,586 subscribers15 September 2026 — 59,896 subscribers17 September 2026 — 52,927 subscribers27 September 2026 — 43,954 subscribers43,9547 August 202627 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 51 days, net +37,508. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 22:3543,954-8,973
17 Sept 2026, 17:2052,927-6,969
15 Sept 2026, 12:4159,896+53,310
11 Sept 2026, 17:396,586-58
7 Sept 2026, 07:186,644+865
2 Sept 2026, 05:275,779-599
30 Aug 2026, 05:076,378-57
27 Aug 2026, 11:336,435-121
24 Aug 2026, 06:286,556-178
20 Aug 2026, 19:566,734+2
17 Aug 2026, 13:246,732+349
14 Aug 2026, 15:066,383-6
11 Aug 2026, 06:016,389-49
8 Aug 2026, 05:266,438-8
7 Aug 2026, 17:476,446no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:336,446first reading

Engagement

146 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.521%
avg views ÷ 43,954 subscribers
Avg views / post
229
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 146 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 68 of 100 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held146 (29 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total22,888
Reactions total350
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 06:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
554
Videos
22
Links
115

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

504 reactions across 93 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣26252.0%
❤7314.5%
🖕6212.3%
👍499.72%
💔203.97%
🔥163.17%
😐112.18%
❤‍🔥81.59%
🍌30.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 504 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
101
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 146 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
80
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Stars_Rush. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 146 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 02:44 UTC31 views4 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🪙قیمت دلار به 259,000 رسید

🖕4

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

29 Sept 2026, 17:57 UTC118 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🎁تون رفت بالا گیفت ها ریختن و تون ریخت ولی گیفت ها برنگشتن این است شاهکار تلگرام✈️

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

29 Sept 2026, 14:21 UTC132 views13 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🪙قیمت دلار به 253,200 رسید

🖕11😐2

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

28 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 30 September 2026

🎁بعد از دو سال این دو آبنبات توسط ی نفر آپگرید شدن و به طرز عجیبی جفتشون بلک در اومدن. t.me/nft/LolPop-434551 t.me/nft/LolPop-434552

🤣3

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

28 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC207 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🎁این گیفت پپه به قیمت 230000$ درر مارکت اپ فروش رفت خریدار 9ماه پیش به این گیفتو به قیمت 158000$ خریده بود✅

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

27 Sept 2026, 16:33 UTC206 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026

💎Ton : 1.68$ | 395000 toman

😐1

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

27 Sept 2026, 14:09 UTC214 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🎁وضعیت بازار گیفت به تون و تتر 🪙دلاری ریزش خاصی نداشتن و بعضی گیفتا هم قیمتشون افزایش پیدا کرد Ton : 1.59$

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

27 Sept 2026, 11:41 UTC173 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026

استارز اگر قصد داشتید نقد کنید(روی چنل/اکانت/گپ) پیوی پیام بدید تسویه تونی و تتری هر کدوم که خودتون بخواید⚡️ گیفتی چیزی هم اگه داشتید تا سقف 4.5 جز 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 میخرم به قیمت فلور ✈️| @poor_iman

❤1

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

26 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC216 views6 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

و با ی رشد کوچیک از تون بازار گیفت ها به معنای واقعی بگا رفت🐸

🤣6

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

26 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC182 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @tonusdprices

1.53$

🔥1

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

25 Sept 2026, 19:36 UTC239 views11 reactionsread 30 September 2026

هم اکنون سکوت معنادار آیت الله مجتبی خامنه‌ای رو شاهد هستیم

🤣10🔥1

Signed 𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑵

Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @Stars_Rush. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Stars_Rush edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 September 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙈𝙍_𝙈𝙊𝙉𝙀𝙔” (@Stars_Rush), 43,954 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stars_Rush.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.