🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 Hi SW fans, during these terrible market conditions we will be suspending StarWallet whilst building the third iteration. If you know anyone who's a fan or a user, know that this isn't the end, just send them over to https://t.me/StarWalletChat for updates. 👋

Channel
STARWALLET NEWS
@StarWallet_News
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
770subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001994141371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StarWallet_News |
| Description | Get updates, sneak peeks, news and resources about the StarWallet portfolio tracker. To chat, join: https://t.me/SLOTHS_ALLSTARS |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StarWallet_News |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 770 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 770 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 39
- Videos
- 24
- Links
- 80
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 22s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 20 | 39.2% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 35.3% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 19.6% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2024 to 7 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 STARWALLET IS BACK UP AND RUNNING THANKS FOR YOUR PATIENCE. Please dm @RySloth if you're having any issues.
🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 STARWALLET IS CURRENTLY DOWN FOR MAINTENANCE - WILL UPDATE WHEN IT IS BACK UP.
👍1
🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 Hey Fans, we have received a great overview video of @StarWallet_Bot Please like it, share it, have a watch and tell us what you think. Version 3 will look significantly different to the current build in this video, so you can look back on this to compare. CHECK IT OUT BELOW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yatXptlt7qc&t=480s&ab_channel=Immortaltalks Don't forget to join: https://t.me/StarWal
🔥2👍1
🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 Hey Fans, I'm (@RySloth) going to start touring around to different channels and do a amas runs for the upcoming third version of @StarWallet_Bot which will see some major upgrades, enhancements and new features. I'd like to know if you have favourite public or private lounges and channels? Feel free to dm @RySloth if the groups you're suggesting are private.
🔥5👍2
🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡 HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE! Get ready for some major announcements, partnerships, developments and growth from the @StarWallet_Bot team.
🔥8❤5
Hey project owners and teams. If you list @StarWallet_Bot as a trusted partner on your website, reach out to me (@RySloth) and I'll add you to a supporting projects list to show our appreciation! Channel list: https://t.me/ZHOAonBNB https://t.me/DoopOnSOL http://t.me/TripTheRabbit https://t.me/AventaProject https://t.me/twolandstokenportal Hoge Website: Hoge.gg ca: 0xfad45e47083e4607302aa43c65fb3106f1cd7607 erc20 …
🔥2❤1
Hypothetical expression of interest. Which chain would you be most excited about appearing on @StarWallet_Bot next?
- SUI44%
- XRP39%
- PULSE18%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2🔥2
Please make sure to like, retweet and follow this X post. https://x.com/StarwalletBot/status/1861602123755950195?t=4x1K7yDmBvjdQYWRV0Hcow&s=19
❤1
STARWALLET IS MOVING TO A DEDICATED CHANNEL. Hey fans, To celebrate the upcoming StarWallet V3 upgrades, I will be creating a dedicate chat. Now people can discuss StarWallet enhancements, have general chit chat, post screenshots, discuss issues and errors and even provide feedback. This channel is new, so I'll be tinkering whilst you're all settling in. Come in, have a look and a play: https://t.me/StarWalletCh…
👍2❤1
Don't forget to add @StarWallet_Bot to as many channels as you can. Get your hands off of your wallets and use the StarWallet portfolio tracker. Add to your channel, give it admin (no permissions required) Type /wallet And you're good to go. Follow for more news: https://t.me/StarWallet_News
👍3
STARWALLET IS NOW ON BLUESKY Making sure that we cover all socials so that nobody misses out on the latest updates. Follow Today. https://bsky.app/profile/starwallet.bsky.social
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StarWallet_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hypothetical expression of interest. Which chain would you be most excited about appearing on @StarWallet_Bot next?
- SUI44%
- XRP39%
- PULSE18%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2024 to 7 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@starwallet_bot · 169 postsArkiTechSupport
@ArkiTechSupport · 41 postAventa Announce Official
@AventaProject · 1,2331 postCryptiQ Official Entry
@cryptiqbrowser · 901 postDoop Portal
@DooponSOL · 1161 postDSQ Solutions
@DSQSolutions · 1471 postEnki Portal
@enkiportal · 3431 postLaserCats Token
@LaserCatsToken · 1111 postMemeleon & the Blockchain Bandits Gateway
@MemeLeonSol · 451 postMiNDTokenOfficial
@MiNDTokenOfficial · 31 post$OKANE_PORTAL
@OKANE_SOL · 2,9021 postPickboxer Official
@pickboxer · 1431 postRaidar
@raidar · 41,9341 postSun Dum Gai Portal
@Sun_Dum_Gai_OfficiaL · 1611 postThe Rugged Lounge
@The_Rugged_Lounge · 471 postTriptheRabbit | PORTAL
@triptherabbit · 1221 postTwo Lands (Portal)
@twolandstokenportal · 2541 postVALHALLA PORTAL
@valhalla_cto · 1101 postValue Focused Project
@ValueFocusedProject · 2421 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 7
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 7
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@StarWallet_News named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STARWALLET NEWS” (@StarWallet_News), 770 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StarWallet_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.