Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for StarCrime | По ту сторону даты

Channel

StarCrime | По ту сторону даты

@SstarCrime

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

291subscribers

+277 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004462329609
TypeChannel
Username@SstarCrime
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SstarCrime

Growth

14291152.57 August 2026 — 14 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21 subscribers22 August 2026 — 291 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +277. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:05291+270
14 Aug 2026, 13:2821+5
11 Aug 2026, 21:4616no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:0516+2
7 Aug 2026, 12:0714first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.14%
avg views ÷ 291 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.7
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
35.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total379
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3626.5%
💋3022.1%
🔥2518.4%
❤‍🔥1914.0%
🍓139.56%
🥰107.35%
😱21.47%
🌚10.735%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC8 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Voice message

Оч важно, объясняю базу разборов на этом канале‼️ Смотреть на картинку с кругом! В комментариях будет расшифровка текстом

3💋3🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC8 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Наконец, этот момент настал! Смотрим, что же указывает на трагедию в натальной карте Цоя? Что скрыто за датой, которая стала смертельно опасной? 🦇 Смотрим указатели. В первую очередь был опасным день (транзит)

3🍓3🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTCviews —

StarCrime | По ту сторону даты pinned «Под этот пост можно кидать натальные карты/даты рождения (можно без времени рождения, только дату, главное скажите) своих треш и ку-ку бывших/знакомых, будем разбирать тут совершенно бесплатново, если будет что-то интересное и мне вкатит 😆😆 Хорошевые примеры…»

10 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC10 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Под этот пост можно кидать натальные карты/даты рождения (можно без времени рождения, только дату, главное скажите) своих треш и ку-ку бывших/знакомых, будем разбирать тут совершенно бесплатново, если будет что-то интересное и мне вкатит 😆😆 Хорошевые примеры, неприятновые серьезные события и новости для разбора тоже кидайте. Хотела бы создать личную анонимку, но не шарю, если кто разбирается как делать этого бота, п

🥰4❤‍🔥3🔥32

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC20 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Этот день свершился, наконец-то вводная часть закончилась и можно переходить к разборам! 🤩 Я уверена, что вводная часть нужна, потому что большинство людей не понимают астрологию и выглядит так, будто вещают инфу из ниоткуда, доверия в этом мало, я с таким уже встречалась 🤩 Старалась максимально упростить, но и внести базу и термины, которые будут повторяться в постах. Если все же что-то не понятно, можно спрашива

💋32🍓2

7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC57 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

С чего начинается разбор? А откуда ты все эти значения берешь? В каждом разборе я буду смотреть на 3 вещи: ✨атальную карту человека ⭐️ Небо в момент его рождения. Она показывает заложенные с рождения риски и уязвимости, склонности и таланты. Небо в день события - ✨ранзит Астрологическое небо (именно астрологическое, не небо над нами) поделено на 12 секторов - 12 знаков зодиака, по которым постоянно движутся планет

3❤‍🔥2💋2

6 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC21 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пока начало ведения канала может быть нудноватым, люблю я все оформить. Осталась одна тема и будет разбор Цоя, если ничего нового не вылезет

2❤‍🔥2💋2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC24 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мы кстати можем менять этажность по жизни. ♓️♐️ На примере тех же рыб/стрельцов и нептунианских энергий - был наркоманом, человеком зависимым или заблудшим (Нептун унес в состояние не здесь, в первом случае с помощью веществ, во втором психически), а стал работником при храме, начал вместе с группой, объединенной одной верой (Нептун про компанию, даже общину с конкретной целью), преисполняться в понимании себя и мир

3💋2🔥2❤‍🔥1🍓1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC20 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Так почему же одна дата рождения вестник трагедии, а вторая нет? В продолжение прошлого поста 3️⃣В любой натальной карте существует такая вещь как риски и вариативность. Один и тот же знак зодиака или любое другое положение может проявляться совершенно по-разному. Например, человек знака зодиака Рыбы, может быть рыбаком, художником, пьяницей, просвященным, гуру или психологом, священником, а может даже магом и эзоте

3❤‍🔥1🍓1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC19 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤сть одна вещь, которую нужно понять до начала чтения любых разборов. Почему одна дата или натальная карта становится трагичной, а другая нет и как это определить? Что делать, если натальная карта в разборе уж очень похожа на мою, это причина паники? 〰️〰️〰️〰️ ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ 1️⃣Если у Вас есть похожие натальные положения с человеком или событием, которое мы разбираем, это не означает, что Вас ждёт тот же исход

3❤‍🔥2💋1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC17 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥6🔥4😱2

5 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTCviews —

StarCrime | По ту сторону даты pinned «♥️😭🤣👍😘😉🤣✊😘😢♥️ 🌌 С чего начинается StarCrime. Путешествие по судьбам, символам и поиск закономерностей. (Проще говоря, о чём это пространство для меня) 🌌 Дисклеймер перед прочтением любых разборов‼️ 🌌 Почему одна натальная карта становится трагичной, а…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SstarCrime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 354,412 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“StarCrime | По ту сторону даты” (@SstarCrime), 291 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SstarCrime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.