Channel
@Squalus_ALPHA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004362608310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Squalus_ALPHA |
| Created | 17 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Squalus_ALPHA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 23 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 23 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (17 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 286 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 38.5% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 、、Вообще, я тут задумался, и пришел к выводу, что могу поделиться одним... наблюдением. На нашем великолепном курорте нет волн, вообще никаких! Поэтому моя крутая доска для серфинга где-то лежит, пылится. . . . Но несмотря на это, мы слышим шум волн, которые будто бы бьются о что-то, даже если море всегда очень спокойное! Хотя, признаюсь, за все время пребывания в этом чудном месте у нас ни разу не было штормов или…
🍓1
Привет! Хотела спросить, эта картинка похожа на тебя? И у тебя есть плюшевая игрушка акулы? 🤩 、、Не смотря на то, что я работаю в баре и практически там живу, я за здоровый образ жизни, поэтому, к моему сожалению, нет! И ещё, к большему сожалению, у меня нет плюшевой акулы, но очень бы хотелось. Я практически не выхожу с курорта, по состоянию здоровья, а никто из моих многоуважаемых друзей не хочет мне ничего прино…
😢1
Подтверждение что акулы крутость 、、Акулы – это стопроцентная крутость 🤩 Простите, что так вчера запоздал с ответами, но вчера был очень насыщенный день, думаю вы и сами знаете уже! ! Я очень-очень надеюсь, что вы подружитесь с нашими младшими, они действительно хорошие и милые, только если их не спугнуть . . . Но вы не такие, я верю вам!
❤🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
😒 、、、Доброе утро всем! как вы относитесь к своим коллегам? как стало ясно с кем-то вы друзья, а есть ли неприятели? 、、Вообще, я считаю, что мы все друзья, просто кто-то больше, а кто-то...меньше、 Конечно же большую часть времени я провожу с Лабьен, она, наверное, первый человек здесь, с которым я вообще познакомился. А ещё мы вместе являемся гидами для всех новоприбывших ( и главными для остальных сотрудников ), п…
❤2🔥1
Привет!!! Как у тебя дела, как жизнь на курорте? :D 😄 、、Вообще, все супер! Правда Лабьен на меня немного злиться за то, что я весь день где-то в море резвлюсь... Но я думаю, что она не со зла, конечно же. Мы достаточно хорошие друзья, поэтому не обращайте на это внимание! А у вас как? ;D 、、
🐳1
🌟 、、Привет!!!!!!! Я только сейчас понял, что упомянул, что задавать вопросы можно, но не оставил тебе ссылку для этого!! Поэтому прошу простить и помиловать, можем начинать наше знакомство, и я очень надеюсь, что тебе понравится на нашем курорте! Думаю, не будет ничего страшного, что пока пишешь и заполняешь бланки мы поговорим, да? 、、 ☺️
❤1🐳1
🌟HELLO HELLO! ! 🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟Меня зовут Сквал, я являюсь экспертом по серфингу и морю в этом чудном месте! Обращайтесь ко мне, если у вас возникнут проблемы 🤩 🌟🌟Я предпочитаю активное времяпровождение с людьми, поэтому для меня радость, что вы здесь 😄 Спросите меня о чем угодно, и я дам вам ответ!! 🐬 🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩 #lore > весь доступный лор #evillore > недоступный игрокам лор #shittyposting > простые разговоры #content > любой…
❤1🐳1
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Squalus_ALPHA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐟” (@Squalus_ALPHA), 23 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Squalus_ALPHA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.