Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Incredibox Sprunki

@SprunkiProject

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

91subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003753776730
TypeChannel
Username@SprunkiProject
DescriptionSprunki Sprunki Sprunki! Get Funky Funky Funky!
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/SprunkiProject

Growth

909190.57 August 2026 — 90 subscribers8 August 2026 — 91 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:1691no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:3091+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:5290first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.5%
avg views ÷ 91 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (22 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,802
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
35
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5044.6%
💔2925.9%
👀2118.8%
🤯87.14%
💯32.68%
😭10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC65 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#IncrediboxSprunki #Sprunki #Факты

👀41

7 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC63 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Псс. Эй. Эй-эй. Да, это я. Давно не виделись, эй?? Что? Ты меня не знаешь? Чепуха. Мы общались давным-давно... Ты не помнишь? Ага, ну ладно. Меня зовут Флауэр, мистер Флауэр. #IncrediboxSprunki #Sprunki #Факты

👀31

5 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC93 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟: Всё в порядке, Венда, я здесь, чтобы поддержать тебя. Мне очень жаль, что тебя так выгнали с вечеринки. 🌟: На самом деле, я несчастна из-за тебя, это твоя вина. 🌟: Что? #IncrediboxSprunki #Sprunki #Факты

7😭1

4 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC113 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я, кажется, не говорил об отношениях Венды 🌟 с Пинки 🌟 и Саймоном 🌟, которые являются единственными её друзьями (по крайней мере, для них, Венда их не считает друзьями). Венда активно отказывается считать их друзьями, несмотря на то, что позволяет им приближаться к себе. Она также не считает Блэка 🌟 другом, поэтому большую часть времени вообще его не слушает. Венда всё ещё издевается над Саймоном и Пинки, они просто

6👀2

4 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC94 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как бы ответили Спрунки, если бы вы спросили их местоимения? Вот несколько забавных идей из канона, которые я придумал (ну, идея с Рэдди была придумана Нянко): Клукр 🌟 бы сказал, что он — это он/его, например, специально добавив косую черту: «он СЛЭШ его». Блэк 🌟 бы ответил: «Угадай». Или, например, Блэк просто скажет кому-то, что он/его, а когда кто-то спросит, он скажет «она/её», а потом будет использовать други

6💯1

4 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟: Эхехехехе, знаете, сэр, мне кажется, нам нужна небольшая помощь, понимаетееееее? 🌟: Что ты имеешь в виду, Венда? Думаю, мы сами со всем справимся… 🌟: Шшшшшшш, тиш-тиш-тиш-тиш... тише, жёлтенький, ты всё поооортииишь! В общем, разве вам тоже не хочется повеселитьсяяяя? Ну, например, показать свои маленькие фокусы! ... 🌟: Что? Я не ленивая! Просто... мне уже слишком надоело их смотреть, понимаешь... особенно Рэдди

👀41

31 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC153 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟: Фан Бот. 🌟: Да? 🌟: Разве тебе не грустно, что они умерли? 🌟: Что значит "умерли"? 🌟: ...Разве тебя этому никогда не учил? 🌟: Я думаю, нам вообще никогда об этом не рассказывали. 🌟: Ну 🌟: Я почти уверен, что именно Джевин рассказал нам о смерти. 🌟: Откуда ты это знаешь, но не понимаешь ее смысла? 🌟: Меня там не было, отец просто рассказал нам, как прошел его день, и упомянул именно этот конкретный сценарий. 🌟: Ох,

💔151💯1

31 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Эй, вы знали, что Винерия 🌟 и Клукр 🌟 встречались (ТОЧНЕЕ ХОДИЛИ НА СВИДАНИЕ) хотя бы раз? Они думали, что нравятся друг другу, поэтому и договорились о свидании, но потом расстались, потому что оба поняли, что Клукр не может угнаться за болтливой и немного гиперактивной натурой Винерии, а Винерию раздражает, когда Клукр постоянно выбалтывает факты или знания, которые она якобы сказала в шутку или не восприняла всер

🤯6👀2

31 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Концепт-арты для коллаборации с плейсом FUNHOUSE в Roblox. #IncrediboxSprunki #Sprunki #Факты

6🤯2

31 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Это действительно могло бы произойти. Клукр 🌟 легко перевозбуждается, и непрерывная болтовня Гарнольда 🌟 — один из способов это предотвратить. Он пытается сдержать свой гнев, поэтому чувствует себя плохо из-за того, как сильно злится, когда срывается. #IncrediboxSprunki #Sprunki #Факты

4

31 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC98 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Спрунки нельзя пить алкоголь. Единственным, кому действительно удалось выпить и напиться из всех – Таннер 🌟, потому что люди забыли взять именно те напитки, которые должны были быть на столе. #IncrediboxSprunki #Sprunki #Факты

6👀3💯1

31 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Еще раз хочу отметить, что вся телевизионная черта Бруда 🌟 — это его «глупость», потому что это была его собственная идея и добровольное решение, а не тех, кто создает шоу. Хотя он даже не пытается притворяться глупым, он просто делает вид, что ничего не замечает и проявляет любопытство, что также приводит к ошибкам, но обычно это не для того, чтобы над чем-то посмеяться или чтобы на это смотрели свысока. Он был соз

4👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @SprunkiProject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 368,575 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Incredibox Sprunki” (@SprunkiProject), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SprunkiProject.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.