Channel
@SpaceTherapySchegoleva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
408subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001978542720 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SpaceTherapySchegoleva |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SpaceTherapySchegoleva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 408 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 409 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 412 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 412 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (6 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 77 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
58 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 34.5% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 32.8% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 29.3% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 Скидка 40% в садовом центре! Как не сойти с ума? 😅 Для садовода это испытание посильнее любого коридора затмений. Заходишь за секатором… Выходишь с тележкой, в которой: ✔️три гортензии; ✔️два можжевельника; ✔️японский клён; ✔️пять многолетников; ✔️и растение, которое «такое миленькое», хотя куда его сажать — вообще непонятно. Не покупайте растения по принципу: «Потом разберёмся, куда посадить». Именно с эт…
❤5👍2🔥1
Август. Коридор затмений. Время чтобы понять свои кармические задачи на жизнь. Время, когда Вселенная нажимает на «паузу» для всей внешней суеты и выкручивает на максимум звук нашего внутреннего голоса. Приглашаю вас в клуб! Двери открыты на несколько дней. Клуб «Терапия пространства» - это женское общество, женская энергия, где каждый месяц мы делаем практики и изучаем определенную тему, которая находит отраже…
❤2👍1🔥1
Ирина Щеголева - Терапия пространства pinned Deleted message
Я часто думаю о том, как всё в жизни не случайно… В детстве у меня не было дачи, но моя комната всегда напоминала маленький ботанический сад. Я могла часами возиться с грунтом, пересаживать, поливать, наводить идеальный порядок в своих зелёных владениях 🪴 Эта любовь к земле и созиданию, видимо, проросла так глубоко, что осталась со мной навсегда. Даже когда я выросла, меня тянуло полоть сорняки и сажать что-то но…
👍4❤3🔥2
Год назад я сорвала веточку Чубушника во дворе. Совершенно обычный Чубушник, но меня потрясла его высота - больше 3-х метров. Мой малыш дал корни и посажен на постоянное место.
👍4🔥2❤1
У меня 3 сорта- сейчас цветёт обыкновенный. Но цветёт как всегда пышно и ароматно. Есть низкорослый чубушкиник около метра высотой, но он ещё только в бутонах. И сильнорослый ' снежная буря' махровые крупные цветы, но я его поздно пересадила в этом году и он переболевает, вид никакой, и пока это год для него провальный, но я, надеюсь переживет эту пересадку и в следующем году покажет себя.
👍1
Делитесь фотографиями своих чубушников 😉
В 2025-м чубушник (Philadelphus) «Petite Perfume Pink’» получил приз. У него необычные розовые цветы со сложным переходом цвета и небольшие размеры – 1,5 на 1,5 м.
🔥4
У чубушника существует огромное количество сортов — точное число постоянно меняется, так как селекционеры по всему миру продолжают выводить новые гибриды. В садоводстве используются десятки популярных и проверенных временем культиваров, которые различаются формой куста (от прямостоячих до арочных), размером и махровостью цветков, а также оттенком аромата. Вот лишь некоторые из самых известных и востребованных сор…
#Дневники растений Я — Чубушник. Да-да, тот самый куст с волшебным ароматом, который вы часто называете «садовым жасмином». Я цвету в садах по всей России, и мой запах наполняет июньские вечера такой нежностью и уютом... Но сегодня я хочу не просто радовать вас своим видом, но и немного рассказать о себе. Вы удивитесь, но ботанически мы с настоящим жасмином — совсем не родственники. Мы похожи лишь внешне и аромато…
Не знаете с какой композиции начать перепрошивку участка? Присылайте видео в личные сообщения всего участка, и вместе мы выберем с чего начать 😉
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SpaceTherapySchegoleva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 550,705 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ирина Щеголева - Терапия пространства” (@SpaceTherapySchegoleva), 408 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SpaceTherapySchegoleva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.