Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Southampton

@SouthamptonFC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001229732507
TypeChannel
Username@SouthamptonFC
DescriptionOfficial Channel Southampton in telegram instagram: instagram.com/southamtonFC Twitter: Twitter.com/SouthamtonFC Telegram: Telegram.me/SouthamptonFC ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 17 January 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SouthamptonFC

Growth

497 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:0049no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:4649first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 January 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

18 May 2021, 17:52 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

HALF-TIME Southampton 0-0 Leeds United @SouthamptonFC

18 May 2021, 16:36 UTC860 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Southampton FC (Telegram) Milestone 🆙 Congratulations to Alex Mc crathy 3 who will tonight make his 100th Premier League appearance for Saints FC ! 👏

21 Apr 2021, 16:34 UTC401 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Enough is enough. Not online. Not in football. Not in wider society. There is #NoRoomForRacism, anywhere. @SouthamptonFC

20 Feb 2021, 15:50 UTC474 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

MOTM vs Chelsea ?

  1. Minamino54%
  2. Vestergaard18%
  3. Redmond8%
  4. Ward prowse20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @SouthamptonFC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Feb 2021, 15:50 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

MOTM vs Chelsea ?

  1. Minamino54%
  2. Vestergaard18%
  3. Redmond8%
  4. Ward prowse20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2021 to 18 May 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,085,723 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Southampton” (@SouthamptonFC), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SouthamptonFC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.