Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

South Spy

@SouthAmigos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212294034
TypeChannel
Username@SouthAmigos
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SouthAmigos

Growth

1101141127 August 2026 — 114 subscribers9 August 2026 — 114 subscribers15 August 2026 — 110 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:34110-4
9 Aug 2026, 06:01114no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:08114first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 24 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2237.3%
2135.6%
🔥1525.4%
🤨11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 20 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SouthAmigos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 December 2025 to 20 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Jan 2026, 11:17 UTC239 views9 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Дорогие друзья. С копитрейдингом я пока сворачиваюсь. Скажу честно: психологически сложно абстрагироваться от давления осознания того, что за твоей торговлей кто-то наблюдает. Из-за этого появляется суета и принимаются неверные решения. Думаю, многие сталкивались с ситуацией, когда «всё валится из рук», если за тобой смотрят — как оказалось, в трейдинге это работает точно так же. Финальный результат за 40 с лишним

7🔥2

29 Dec 2025, 19:06 UTC494 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

15m TF. После активного падения по Rave появились новые объёмы. Это привело к смене структуры и переходу инструмента в фазу консолидации. Образовался чёткий уровень сопротивления с несколькими касаниями. За этим уровнем долгое время накапливалась нереализованная ликвидность в виде стопов продавцов. Пробой уровня приведёт к активации стопов и дальнейшему росту цены. Ожидается импульсный пробой уровня после небольшой

4

29 Dec 2025, 16:37 UTC388 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Просто для отчета, пошло согласно ожиданиям даже без подлого отката на +7%, хотелось конечно поймать от выделенной красной зоны, но немного не дошли. Но и так неплохо. 😏

2👍2🔥1

28 Dec 2025, 21:33 UTC354 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

15m TF. Инструмент сейчас активно торгуется на повышенных для себя объёмах. После стремительного роста он перешёл в стадию консолидации. В этой стадии сформировался чёткий диапазон с двумя ярко выраженными границами. С обеих сторон этого диапазона накапливалась нереализованная ликвидность. Верхняя граница образована равными максимумами. Пробой этой границы может спровоцировать активацию стопов, что приведёт к импул

2👍1🔥1

27 Dec 2025, 22:39 UTC276 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отработало +70% чистыми. Кто , ещё не в теме, читайте закрепленное сообщение.

🔥4👍31

27 Dec 2025, 18:21 UTC257 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Красиво смотрится понаблюдать. К сожалению есть только на MEXC.

🔥1

25 Dec 2025, 07:37 UTC281 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, друзья. PumpBTC всё-таки пробился, в соответствии с ожиданиями, и это очень хорошо — движение дало уверенный памп на 17%. Поймать его могли только те, кто не спал. Но объёмы выросли в 3 раза, и возможно это ещё не конец. У меня будут выходные, поэтому пока не смогу делать качественный анализ и не буду публиковать сигналы. Если вы хотите научиться самостоятельно искать такие монеты, прочитайте закреплён

👍4🔥2

24 Dec 2025, 19:51 UTC272 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Итоги дня по анализу в группе PIPIN: +50% чистого движения за несколько минут. ACT: +15% чистого движения. PUMPBTC: дали закол около +2%, но движение быстро затушили. Потенциал сохраняется — для меня инструмент стал выглядеть даже интереснее, продолжаю наблюдать. SSV: к точке входа так и не пришли, на данный момент неактуально. Вернусь к нему позже. Общий итог: S&P 500 и золото обновляют исторические максимумы,

👍42🔥1

24 Dec 2025, 15:14 UTC175 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @markettwitsPhoto

⚠️✴️#BTC #крипто BlackRock активно переводит BTC на биржи, сообщают различные мониторинговые службы = клиенты продают BTC ETF поэтому, скорее всего, сегодня будет уже пятый подряд день оттоков из спотовых BTC ETF

👍3

24 Dec 2025, 15:04 UTC160 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

1h TF. По инструменту PUMPBTC наблюдается повышенная активность новых участников во время консолидации. Сформировался каскад уровней, за которыми долго накапливалась нереализованная ликвидность продавцов. Также сформировался локальный наклонный уровень, к которому цена поджимается. Ожидаю, что пробой этого наклонного уровня активирует цепочку ликвидаций и приведет к дальнейшему росту цены. Входить рекомендую при уве

👍4

24 Dec 2025, 11:23 UTC177 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

15m TF. Инструмент активно торгуется на повышенных объемах. После уверенного роста произошло накопление, что сформировало уровень сопротивления. За ним накапливалась ликвидность в виде стопов продавцов. Сейчас мы наблюдаем активное приближение к этому уровню. Ожидается небольшая локальная проторговка возле этого уровня, а затем импульсный пробой. Рекомендуется входить в позицию при увеличении активности в стакане п

24 Dec 2025, 10:51 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Если вы хотите так же находить такие монетки, перед импульсом, смотрите закрепленное сообщение. БЕСПЛАТНО - НЕ КУРСЫ - НЕ ВИПКА - БЕЗ РЕГИСТРАЦИЙ

🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @SouthAmigos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,449,775 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“South Spy” (@SouthAmigos), 110 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SouthAmigos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.