Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sous le ciel de paris

@Souslecieldeparis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,529subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001101617969
TypeChannel
Username@Souslecieldeparis
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 July 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Souslecieldeparis

Growth

4,5174,5294,5236 August 2026 — 4,518 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,518 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,517 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,522 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,529 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,515–4,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:384,529+7
9 Aug 2026, 13:114,522+5
6 Aug 2026, 23:444,517-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:034,518no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:504,518first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 4,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
836
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total23,398
Reactions total556
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

389 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14336.8%
14236.5%
💔389.77%
🤣379.51%
😁143.60%
🔥102.57%
😐30.771%
😭20.514%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 556reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC264 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یکی از نشانه‌های بلوغ انسان همین است که بداند چطور چیزهایی را که برای دیگران اهمیت دارد درک کند، حتی اگر برای خودش اهمیتی نداشته باشد✨

👍94

10 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC429 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

فقط خواستم بدونی تنها نیستی؛ منم یهو یادم میاد و گریه‌ام میگیره..

💔282

10 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC421 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mutluol

دوستان یه یاد آوری کنم ؛ کسـی که خودش مشغول ساختنه، وقت خراب کردن بقیه رو نداره:)🙌🏻

🔥10👍7

10 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC490 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

برگرفته از سخن شمس تبريزي؛ آنكه خورشيد درونش را بيابد، چه نياز به فانوس خاموش ديگران…

16

9 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈2,000 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

باورم نمیشه “تعهد” که ابتدایی‌ترین وظیفه آدماس، تبدیل شده به مهم‌ترین ملاک و به راحتی هم پیدا نمیشه.

15

9 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC607 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عده‌ای می‌گویند من بسیار مهربانم! و عده‌ای می‌گویند، بسیار بدخلقم و ناجور! هر دو را باور کن، چون هرکسی نسخه‌ای از مرا دیده که لیاقتش را داشته...

13👍8

9 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC608 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یکی از تلخ‌ترین ویژگی‌های آدم‌های آسیب‌دیده اینه که محبت رو دیر باور می‌کنن اما بی‌توجهی رو همون لحظه.

👍259

7 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC795 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏باور کنید اگر تمام پاهای دنیا را قطع کنید، نمیتوانید سریع تر بدویید. ‏خراب کردن دیگران، ‏تاثیری روی روند‌‌ رشدتان ندارد.

👍203😭2

6 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC806 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چقدر غم‌انگیز است دیدن نیمه‌ی پنهان و تاریک آدم‌ها، درست زمانی که به نور و زیبایی‌شان ایمان آورده بودی.

👍138

6 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC653 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hakunaa_matataa

شما یادتون نمیاد، ما بچه بودیم یه سریال پخش میشد به اسم مدار صفر درجه… این سریال یه آهنگ تیتراژی داشت وقتی پخش میشد کل ترس و وحشت و استرس دنیا به دلم میریخت… «وقتی گریبان عدم با دست خلقت می‌درید…» احساس میکردم الانه که روز قیامت بشه دیگه و از پل صراط پرتمون کنن تو جهنم. @hakunaa_matataa

🤣20😐31👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Souslecieldeparis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 134,961 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بايكوت
@baycot · 149,237
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sous le ciel de paris” (@Souslecieldeparis), 4,529 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Souslecieldeparis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.