Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: FIRST โLove&Letterโ
@Soulstice17
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
696subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002667970437 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Soulstice17 |
| Description | ENG. At dayโs end, simple words like โgood jobโ hold great significance. Weโll ensure this picturesque day becomes an exquisite memory @Soulstice17_STAFF โง @SoulsticesBot @SoulsstaffBot (sfs) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Soulstice17 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 696 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 696 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 15
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 6 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 2 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 7 | 36.8% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 15.8% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 2 | 10.5% | |
| โก | 1 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ฅ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| ๐คฉ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 6 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
(+๐ฐ๐ฌ๐ฐ.) โ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐ก ๐ฆ๐ง๐จ๐๐๐ก๐ง ๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐: ๐๐ข๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ก๐-๐-๐๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅ, ๐ณ๐ง๐. Could it acquire oneness in the tale recounted through letters while we attended high school. Flames of pleasure that represents instances of admiration, takes on, and tenderness with loved ones. Letters drove between the pages, causing embers within a bouquet of sentiments but they ought to blossom within classrooms. ๐ ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ช๐๐ง๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฆ๐โฆ
โค3โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐1
Sticker, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/R3uzv5oiu9E
Anyone remember when I came to Sehoโs Relay? Seho hyung called Jinkyung noona because I said I wanted to make kimchi for the upcoming Shua & Cook. And finally I was invited by Jinkyung noona to make kimchi! Donโt forget to watch it~ Also donโt forget to eat a lot of delicious food. Have a good weekend, solis!
Hey solis, how was your day? I brought my guitar to Osaka and covered a chinese song titled Old Boy by Chopstick Brothers! Hope you like it~ You can also suggest me any songs you would like to hear. Also there are behind the scene footages taken by our Minghao, he taught me this hahaha~
Sticker, posted without a caption
Been wandering around the merch shop and caught between way too many Ferrari figures, I swear choosing is harder than it should be. Then, not me thinking an ice cream would help me decide, spoiler: it surely didnโt. But the view was beautiful enough to make the whole moment feel perfect anyway. ๐๏ธ๐น๏ธ
โค4๐2โก1โคโ๐ฅ1๐ฅ1๐คฉ1๐ฅฐ1๐1
Sticker, posted without a caption
[๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐] โ EP. 147 โChat, Chat #2โ
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Soulstice17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 1,028,016 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: FIRST โLove&Letterโโ (@Soulstice17), 696 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soulstice17.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.