🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩
custom 54272248110026899745custom 52134010753521129073custom 52134367450555053873

Channel
@Soul_Amor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001268105141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Soul_Amor |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Soul_Amor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 70 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 71 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 71 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
156 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447475994120181216 | 28 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5402115779355247195 | 23 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5352681246944167058 | 11 | 7.05% | |
| custom 5390830486497016405 | 11 | 7.05% | |
| custom 5395499536854573467 | 11 | 7.05% | |
| custom 5305649465267353225 | 10 | 6.41% | |
| custom 5456209595368237317 | 10 | 6.41% | |
| custom 5447568735349002281 | 9 | 5.77% | |
| custom 5391076497928763977 | 8 | 5.13% | |
| custom 6088896056601352593 | 8 | 5.13% | |
| custom 5447432146799055507 | 6 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5427224811002689974 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| custom 5373012939223621841 | 4 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5463013012543664863 | 4 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5213401075352112907 | 3 | 1.92% | |
| custom 5213436745055505387 | 3 | 1.92% | |
| custom 5467742179558447875 | 2 | 1.28% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 14 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩
custom 54272248110026899745custom 52134010753521129073custom 52134367450555053873
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53908304864970164055custom 54677421795584478752
Мы гуляли почти пять часов, ели хинкали и много смеялись. Ноги устали, но сердце было счастливым — потому что рядом была она 🤍
custom 54021157793552471959custom 53526812469441670586
ещё один поток позади Мои хорошие 🫠 такое чувство будто у меня день рождения 😂
custom 53526812469441670584custom 54021157793552471954custom 54474759941201812163custom 54562095953682373173
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🤩
custom 54474759941201812166custom 54562095953682373173
мы девчонки странные порой мы всегда всех наших палачей называем, мой герой.
custom 54474759941201812164custom 54562095953682373174
теперь захотелось прочитать этот рассказ💔 оказывается мы очень интересные произведения проходили по узбекской литературе 🤭
custom 54021157793552471953custom 54475687353490022813custom 54474759941201812162
сказочная погода.🤩
custom 54021157793552471956custom 54475687353490022816custom 54474759941201812165
Испытания делают нас сильнее.🫶
custom 53910764979287639775custom 54474759941201812165custom 53526812469441670581custom 54021157793552471951
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53056494652673532255custom 60888960566013525935custom 53910764979287639773custom 54474759941201812163
Написала чату жпт: как я относилась к нему за всё это время
custom 53056494652673532255custom 60888960566013525933custom 53908304864970164052custom 54474321467990555072
январь, такой невезучий месяц.
custom 53954995368545734676custom 53908304864970164054custom 54474321467990555074
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Soul_Amor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,453,076 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“luv” (@Soul_Amor), 70 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soul_Amor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.