Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝆹𝅥 𝆭 𝅄ׄ𝒮ℴ𝓃𝓃𝓊𝒿𝅄ׄ{РЕКВЕСТЫ,КОНКУРС}

Channel

𝆹𝅥 𝆭 𝅄ׄ𝒮ℴ𝓃𝓃𝓊𝒿𝅄ׄ{РЕКВЕСТЫ,КОНКУРС}

@Sonnuj_Kot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

43subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002869415241
TypeChannel
Username@Sonnuj_Kot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sonnuj_Kot

Growth

434644.58 August 2026 — 46 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:4443-3
10 Aug 2026, 14:4546no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:1846first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.9%
avg views ÷ 43 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.3
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held17 (4 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total228
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5413596660729139338847.1%
custom 5368679007984317658423.5%
custom 5330070945665163455211.8%
custom 522906567148413324515.88%
custom 544726948779764185915.88%
🍓15.88%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC9 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Папищики, нагадую, що залишилося ще 3 дні дд. Результати будуть 14 серпня Якщо буде мало людей, я продовжу дд до 23 серпня Встигніть взяти участь и отримати призи❤️

custom 53686790079843176583

8 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @coincreatifPhoto

ℬℴ𝓃𝒿ℴ𝓊𝓇 ──────────────────── Перший реквест для мого сонного сонечка, @Aerobatics5000! В неї вайби енергійного але все ж стриманого дракона, якому більше подобаються різні битви та виклики, ніж схрещення та інше. ────────────────────

custom 53686790079843176581

8 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˗ˏˋ────────────────────ˎˊ˗ Ну шо, ловіть ★Хто перший напише слово "ловлю", тот і забере цю фруктову мишку ᨳ꒰ ´ ˘ ` ꒱੭- #ловилка #флуд #Спати_Хочу Власниця: @i_lhlixxx💋 ˗ˏˋ────────────────────ˎˊ˗

8 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

Через 7 минут будет ловилка на эту бусю, так что успей её забрать🤍 Что такое "Ловилка"? Автор присылает пост с адоптом и тот кто первый напишет слово ловлю тот и забирает адопта

8 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @pumpkin_estPhoto

🤩🤩⭐☺️☺️☺️☺️⭐🤩🤩 -на адоптов от Пам🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩В чем суть?: > Это, грубо говоря, бесплатный розыгрыш адопта, где победители выбираються случайным образом (с помощью рандомайзера) 🤩🤩🤩 🤩☺️словия: <⊹ Быть подписаным на @pumpkin_est <⊹ Сделать репост в свой тгк// 3 пиар чата // 5 друзьям <⊹ Отправить в комы подтверждение репоста и написать номер и желаемого адопта, по типу « 1, хочу получить 3» 🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️☺️равила <- Н

7 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Из за чего вы попали на мой канал?

  1. Через условия лоты, и скоро отпишусь0%
  2. Чисто по рандому33%
  3. Мью17%
  4. Просто очень интересно смотреть на процесс и на твои роботы🫶83%

The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 54135966607291393381

7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC20 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˗ˏˋ──────── . ⁺ .𝑧𝑍 “ ⁺ .────────ˎˊ˗ ˗ˏˋ H•I ˎˊ˗ ★Хочу провести ловилку на цю фруктову мишку.Я так думаю що проведу її десь о 18.00 по мск. ──────────────────── ᨳ꒰ ´ ˘ ` ꒱੭- #арт #флуд #Спати_Хочу ˗ˏˋ────────────────────ˎˊ˗

custom 54135966607291393383custom 53300709456651634551custom 54472694877976418591

7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «𝆹𝅥 𝆭 𝅄ׄ𝒮ℴ𝓃𝓃𝓊𝒿𝅄ׄ{РЕКВЕСТЫ,КОНКУРС}»

7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @coincreatifPhoto

ᥫ᭡ ⸝⸝ Requests (🌊) from Martin ──────────────────── ℬℴ𝓃𝒿ℴ𝓊𝓇 Мені немає що робити, тому, відкриваю реквести Мало хто знає, я граю в гру про драконів і вони мені дуже подобається, тому я хочу поскечити ваших бусьок ──────────────────── Репост не обов'язковий, а підписка - так. Коли скидаєте персонажа, опишіть коротко характер, для того щоб точніше я могла передати вашого персонажа. ─────────────────

custom 52290656714841332451

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Sonnuj_Kot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Из за чего вы попали на мой канал?

  1. Через условия лоты, и скоро отпишусь0%
  2. Чисто по рандому33%
  3. Мью17%
  4. Просто очень интересно смотреть на процесс и на твои роботы🫶83%

The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 523,569 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝆹𝅥 𝆭 𝅄ׄ𝒮ℴ𝓃𝓃𝓊𝒿𝅄ׄ{РЕКВЕСТЫ,КОНКУРС}” (@Sonnuj_Kot), 43 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sonnuj_Kot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.