Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KIFA/ о вере с любовью

Channel

KIFA/ о вере с любовью

@Solovey_jeweler

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

889subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001307438533
TypeChannel
Username@Solovey_jeweler
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Solovey_jeweler

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

88990989911 August 2026 — 909 subscribers11 August 2026 — 909 subscribers20 August 2026 — 907 subscribers27 August 2026 — 903 subscribers3 September 2026 — 904 subscribers11 September 2026 — 901 subscribers18 September 2026 — 889 subscribers11 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 886–912 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:41889-12
11 Sept 2026, 00:58901-3
3 Sept 2026, 00:43904+1
27 Aug 2026, 22:48903-4
20 Aug 2026, 02:43907-2
11 Aug 2026, 20:15909no change
11 Aug 2026, 20:01909first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7985.9%
🔥88.70%
👍55.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC263 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

И вот у меня ещё есть 2 оправы и такие камни, могу собрать в нужном размере Это нежный розовый кварц и как облако перламутр. Кому ? Пишите @solovey_lena

❤15🔥4

Signed Elena Solovey

3 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC264 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Давно меня привлекали такие кольца просто с крупным камнем, все хотелось сделать. И касты были уже давно готовы и камни в наличии и вот все никак , поэтому и мне нужно успеть в последний вагон, сделать, то что давно откладывала Камень кварц аквамарин. Такой прозрачный, то ли льдинка, то ли море. Что-то водное в простой оправе, лаконично, стильно, с мятой фактурой шинка, как такой средиземноморский стиль, тоже всегд…

❤12🔥2

Signed Elena Solovey

3 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC266 viewsread 11 August 2026

Кольцо "Руки " Последнее, 16.5 размер 4000р вместе с доставкой Для приобретения пишите мне @solovey_lena ✅️ Продано 🙏🏻

Signed Elena Solovey

3 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC263 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤12🔥2

Signed Elena Solovey

25 Jun 2026, 17:03 UTC404 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

А вот это ещё одна такая пара, только с амазонитом Тоже люблю этот камень. Все, больше нет таких серег последние собрала. 4700р вместе с доставкой Для покупки мне пишите @solovey_lena ❌️ в комментариях не пишем по заказу ✅️ Продано

❤13

Signed Elena Solovey

25 Jun 2026, 16:58 UTC353 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Серьги с кианитом. И название и цвет океан напоминают. Эти камни давно купила, за их красоту. Все ждали своего часа. Очень люблю такие вот природные камни, с разводами они сами по себе очень живописные. К ним подходит простая оправа и серьги-колечки. Очень удобные. 1 пара таких. 4700р вместе с доставкой ❗️Пишите мне @solovey_lena В комментариях не надо❌️ ✅️Продано

❤12

Signed Elena Solovey

19 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC422 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

❗️Мошенники Присылают ссылку на группу , скорее всего тем, кто в комментариях последние дни писали. Поэтому я часть удалила, те, которые касаются запросов. Разницы визуально нет Но у меня канал, у них группа Что делать будут не знаю Пожалуйста, внимательно

Signed Elena Solovey

17 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTC446 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Подвеска "Маленький принц " 3700р вместе с доставкой (вместо 4500р) @solovey_lena ✅️ Продано

❤15👍5

Signed Elena Solovey

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Solovey_jeweler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KIFA/ о вере с любовью” (@Solovey_jeweler), 889 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Solovey_jeweler.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.