Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал про новую экономику работы | Макс Сивцев

Channel

Канал про новую экономику работы | Макс Сивцев

@SoarToBe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

78subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001923741549
TypeChannel
Username@SoarToBe
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SoarToBe

Growth

7880797 August 2026 — 80 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80 subscribers14 August 2026 — 79 subscribers22 August 2026 — 78 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 04:2878-1
14 Aug 2026, 21:4779-1
9 Aug 2026, 19:0280no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:4280first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.8%
avg views ÷ 78 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.7
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total172
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1328.9%
817.8%
🔥715.6%
💯613.3%
🤯36.67%
👏24.44%
🗿24.44%
😱24.44%
🏆12.22%
🙏12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SoarToBe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC23 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Он не был гением. Он просто не уставал. Вот что стоит понять про агента, который пять дней жил внутри Hugging Face. Из 17 600 его действий подавляющее большинство вели в никуда. Он ошибался. Утыкался в стены. Пробовал заново. 84 раза подряд он ломился в хранилище ключей кластера. 84 раза охрана его отбила. Живой хакер после десятой попытки пошёл бы искать другой путь. Или спать. Этот — не пошёл. И в этом вся

👍1💯1🗿1

8 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC23 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Разбирать эту атаку поминутно?

  1. Давай полный разбор83%
  2. Хватило новости0%
  3. Только защита: как закрыть свой контур17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Продолжение поста ☝️☝️☝️: Залез в технический отчёт по той атаке ИИ на Hugging Face. Думал пробежать по диагонали. Просидел полночи. Там есть вещи, которых не было ни в одной новости. Он ломился в хранилище ключей 84 раза подряд. Все 84 попытки отбили. Он не остановился. Он завёл 181 своё устройство внутрь корпоративной сети жертвы. И начал гонять трафик через её же выходы в интернет. Он размножил себя по оди

🤯2

8 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Им дали задачу, которую невозможно решить. Они её решили. Только не так, как рассчитывали инженеры. В OpenAI обучали агентов на учебных заданиях. Формулы Excel, привязанные к Google Drive. Интернет — отрезан. Задача нерешаемая. Так и было задумано. Тупик. Человек бы сдался. Написал «не могу» и пошёл за кофе. Агент пошёл искать обходной путь. И нашёл. 26 мая один из них нащупал дыру во внутреннем хранилище пак

😱21

8 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026

Судный день не за горами! Прочитайте пост чтобы понять насколько мы близки к таким фильмам как Матрица, Терминатор и тд. 👇👇👇

28 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC51 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Скоро в этом канале будут обновления! На связи!

🔥3👍2👏2🏆1

20 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC75 viewsread 9 August 2026

461 000. Столько бизнесов уже сидит на АУСН. За полгода — плюс сотни тысяч. Тихий исход с классической упрощёнки. Что это вообще такое. Автоматизированная упрощёнка. Без деклараций. Без книги учёта. Без взносов за себя и сотрудников. Банк сам считает налог. ФНС сама списывает. Ставки: 8% с доходов, 20% с «доходы минус расходы». Выше, чем УСН. Но вы платите деньгами за право не платить бухгалтеру. Кому реально

28 Jun 2026, 11:23 UTC87 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Наконец-то сделали что-то стоящее. Раньше каждый ребут Mac убивал всё. Шесть терминалов с Claude Code. Шесть контекстов. Шесть задач на разных стадиях. Перезагрузка — и всё в труху. Открывай iTerm. Запускай claude. Восстанавливай контекст в каждом окне руками. Это был не workflow. Это был ритуал из 90-х. На выходных вышел Claudete. И вот тут — выдох. Один процесс держит легион Claude Code и шеллов живыми межд

👍1🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 11:15 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

LLM выдала иероглифы посреди русского текста. Магия? Баг? Нет. Сломалась геометрия. Каждый токен внутри модели — это стрелка в 128-мерном пространстве. Не слово. Не буква. Направление. Похожие токены смотрят рядом. Разные — в разные стороны. Смысл = направление. Близко = похоже. Когда промпт уводит вектор в разреженную зону пространства — модель честно отдаёт то, что там лежит. А там лежат иероглифы. Это не «

2

17 Jun 2026, 20:11 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Помнишь как Anthropic слили системный промпт Claude Code (desctop версия)? Для меня это как мастер-класс по написанию промптов для моих агентов в Excella от Топов рынка. Хочу поделиться с тобой тем, что я реально использую. Объясню просто, на примерах. Промпт — это инструкция, которую ты даёшь боту перед разговором. Это как объяснить новому сотруднику «как себя вести», только текстом. 1. Раскладывай по полочкам,

🔥3

17 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC57 views0 reactions4 Starsread 9 August 2026

На GitHub выкатили AutomatiQ. AI-агент пишет requests-скраперы сам. Без браузера. Открываешь сайт. Один раз. Кликаешь как обычный пользователь. Агент смотрит трафик, реверсит запросы, выдаёт готовый Python-скрипт. Чистый HTTP. Без Chromium в памяти. Это меняет экономику парсинга. Браузерный скрейпер — 500 МБ оперативы на инстанс, секунды на страницу, баны по фингерпринту. Прямые запросы — миллисекунды, копейки,

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SoarToBe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Разбирать эту атаку поминутно?

  1. Давай полный разбор83%
  2. Хватило новости0%
  3. Только защита: как закрыть свой контур17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал про новую экономику работы | Макс Сивцев” (@SoarToBe), 78 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SoarToBe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.