Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

❄ 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐈𝐋𝐊𝐀 𝑺𝑵𝑬𝒁𝑯𝑲𝑰❄/ 𝙎𝙉𝙀𝙕𝙃𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙉

@Snezhky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002304095771
TypeChannel
Username@Snezhky
DescriptionДобро пожаловать на канал Морозилки! Есть официальный чат канала, надеюсь, вам будет интересно там, правила в закрепе канала. Архив👇 https://t.me/tgksnezhka
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Snezhky

Growth

767 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:0176no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:4976first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.9%
avg views ÷ 76 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (30 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total179
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
500
Videos
84
Links
52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2835.4%
❤‍🔥1519.0%
👍1113.9%
custom 5240472700895399249810.1%
custom 541385221987320560078.86%
custom 541111666071310381356.33%
🔥33.80%
🌭22.53%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC28 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🍷 _RICK_ 😠 🤩 Если честно, мне не нравится результат Уже в тик токе https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4QgXSUe/ #Арт #Пост #РикСанчез 🤩

❤‍🔥52👍2

5 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC41 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🤩 CUTE LITTLE STANLEY 🤩 🤩 Очень хорошенький, быстрый и милый тренд, а я не я если не нарисую это. Правда выложу в тик токе чуть позже. Уже в тик токе! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4u79hGj/ #Анимация #Пост #Видео #Стэнли 🤩

custom 52404727008953992494custom 54111166607131038133custom 541385221987320560031❤‍🔥1👍1

4 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🏝 𝐁𝐔𝐓 𝐈'𝐌 𝐍𝐎𝐓... 🧽 🤩 Любите эту глупенькую губку? Видел одно грустное видео с ним, серия где все его друзья называют его идиотом. Жалко этого милашку :-( 2 часа ночи, меня потянуло рисовать. Уже в тик токе! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4m5CNNe/ Перезалив! #Арт #Пост #Губкабоб #Видео 🗞

3🌭1👍1custom 52404727008953992491

26 Jul 2026, 22:28 UTC69 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐅𝐈𝐋𝐄 𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐄.🤩 🤩 Новая аватарка для аккаунта в тик токе. Забавно, но мне уже надоело ходить с аватаркой где Стэнли попал в бекрумс. Хотя это был мой любимый арт от крутого художника. Не теряйте меня! Пока я сам себя не потерял. #Арт #СтэнлиПайнс #Пост #Новаяава ⊹ ࣪ ﹏𓊝﹏𓂁﹏⊹ ࣪ ˖

❤‍🔥62👍2🌭1

14 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC108 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

PORTFOLIO DAY. 🤩 Чтож поделать, мало рисую я, больше по анимациям. #PortfolioDay

4❤‍🔥1👍1

6 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC102 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Неделю назад мне исполнилось 15 🙂 Очень прикольный прикол получился #Щп

7❤‍🔥1👍1custom 54111166607131038131

4 Jul 2026, 23:34 UTC101 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🤩 BIGGER BETTER STRONGER! 🇺🇸 🤩 Бац! И сюрприз. По крайней мере, это лучшее что я делал. 🤩 Видео уже в тик токе! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSCgNeXy9/ 🤩 #Пост #Анимация #Стэнли #ДядяСтэн #Тренд ⊹ ࣪ ﹏𓊝﹏𓂁﹏⊹ ࣪ ˖

6custom 54138522198732056004custom 52404727008953992493❤‍🔥1👍1custom 54111166607131038131

30 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC88 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @jkarsicPhoto

🤩 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤➗➗ Вот и подошел к концу наш первый ивент!! 🌟Спасибо всем за участие, вы просто чудо 🌟 Напомню о концепции сего мероприятия: каждому участнику в рандомном порядке выдавались жук для хуманизации и условия, усложняющее процесс (пират, ковбой, супергерой и тд) 🤩 Сможете угадать, кому какой прикол достался? А теперь самое вкусное!! ТГК наших участников, самых сладких и хороших: 1// @vlpktgk 2// @hihahahaysoba

3👍1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Snezhky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 858,317 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❄ 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐈𝐋𝐊𝐀 𝑺𝑵𝑬𝒁𝑯𝑲𝑰❄/ 𝙎𝙉𝙀𝙕𝙃𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙉” (@Snezhky), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Snezhky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.