Posted without readable text
custom 54676963350775342387🤯3custom 53145969086420989971

Channel
@SmurfNik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
259subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001651082191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SmurfNik |
| Description | Я здесь, чтобы ломать правила. Мой путь — мой след, не чужой пример. Учусь разрушать стереотипы, следуя своим правилам к своей вершине Анонимка: http://t.me/questianonbot?start=1426518480 Тикток: SmurrfNik Личка: @Monkevi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SmurfNik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 259 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 259 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (14 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,525 |
| Reactions total | 217 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
217 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5314596908642098997 | 61 | 28.1% | |
| custom 5467696335077534238 | 55 | 25.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5282930200668038443 | 27 | 12.4% | |
| 🤩 | 14 | 6.45% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 4.61% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 4.15% | |
| custom 5467670178726702564 | 5 | 2.30% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.84% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 217reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
custom 54676963350775342387🤯3custom 53145969086420989971
ЧЕЛЯБИНСК! |Вообщем, после проведения пряток я понял что люто нехватает коммуникации между теми кто живёт в нашем городе😋😰 » Поэтому я создал группу где мы будем объявлять о гулянках, сходках и т.д. « Присоединяйтесь, общайтесь и никакого токса прошу, сделал удобно чтобы было разбито всё по вкладкам, если вам интересно присоединяйтесь ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/chelgrop https://t.me/chelgrop *снимок при поддержки…
custom 54676963350775342386custom 53145969086420989975
Вообщем прятки прошли супер, решил фонд поднять до 2к, т.к. достаточно много было ребят😊 Было 2 раунда, в 1 искал я с Киселём и не нашли всего 5-ых Во 2 раунде я прятался, было 4-5 искателей, не нашли 10 человек, меня спалили из-за того что эладенсу пел на пятиэтажном дереве хахахахах 💙ВСЕМ СПАСИБО КТО ПРИШЁЛ💙 Возможно позже будет видео-влог с этих пряток😋 (Если кто-то оч круто умеет монтировать напишите)
custom 53145969086420989977
Напоминаю! Завтра грандионзное событие😇 Кто хотел поучаствовать не забывайте вступать в группу https://t.me/+3myCrlLTs6E4ZWIy https://t.me/+3myCrlLTs6E4ZWIy
custom 54676963350775342386❤🔥2
А ещё кидайте под этот пост фотки, видео и т.д. с сегодняшней сходочки. (Сам тоже закину в комменты)
custom 54676963350775342387custom 53145969086420989972
ВАААААС 242🥰🤩🤩
❤🔥12custom 53145969086420989974custom 54676701787267025642custom 52829302006680384431
Домик СмурфНика pinned a photo
Пожаааалуйста 🙏🤩🤩 Хоть бы правда он взял это на рассмотрение))
custom 531459690864209899715custom 52829302006680384433
Как вам такая сикрет фрик джерсяка?)
custom 528293020066803844315🍌1
ГРАНДИОЗНЫЕ ПРЯТКИ #1 Очень хочется сделать классное событие для всех нас, поэтому я решил организовать Прятки ! Зовите всех своих друзей. 🗓️ Дата: Воскресенье 26.07 ⏱ Время начала: 17:00 💰 Призовой фонд — 1500₽ 2000₽ ⭐️ Большая игра в прятки 🥸 Знакомства, видосы и фотки ❗️ Локация, правила и вся остальная информация будут публиковаться в закрытом чате Если тоже хочешь поиграть в прятки, то кидай заявку в чат — 🔗…
custom 546769633507753423813🤩6custom 53145969086420989975custom 52829302006680384431custom 54676701787267025641
Как это будет выглядеть на самом деле🤩
custom 546769633507753423814custom 53145969086420989977custom 52829302006680384434
ПОПРИВЕТСТВУЕМ НАШЕГО НОВОГО УЧАСТНИКА БЕССКВАДА 😈 🤩🤩🤩 🖐SmurfNik`a🖐 Это не просто новый член нашего дружного коллектива, но и серьёзный шаг в развитии всего сквада в целом, прокладывающий дорогу до челябинска🚜🚜🚜🚜🚜🚜🚜 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ТЫ 4️⃣-БРАТУХА/СЕСТРУХА ИЗ ЕКАТЕРИНБУРГА ИЛИ ЧЕЛЯБИНСКА, НО ДО СИХ ПОР НЕ В СКВАДЕ? ТЫ ТВОРЧЕСКИЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК И ХОЧЕШЬ ХАЙПИТЬ, НО НЕ ЗНАЕШЬ КАК НАЧАТЬ? ТЫ ДАВНО ХОТЕЛ ВСТУПИТЬ В БЕССКВАД? Мы …
custom 53145969086420989979custom 52829302006680384432custom 54676701787267025642
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SmurfNik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,046,561 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Домик СмурфНика” (@SmurfNik), 259 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmurfNik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.