Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sly_Foxx42

@Sly_Foxx422

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237657694
TypeChannel
Username@Sly_Foxx422
DescriptionЯ всего лишь 3Dшник что пытается что-то делать
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Sly_Foxx422

Growth

487 August 2026 — 48 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:0448no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:4348first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
185.1%
avg views ÷ 48 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.8
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (24 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total533
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
361
Videos
8
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53260449506960421374329.1%
custom 53075780816769176363322.3%
custom 52244262435160412692919.6%
custom 53102245675102704862818.9%
custom 531235166294851585964.05%
custom 532576274557489139164.05%
custom 524922413055267400132.03%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sly_Foxx422. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC52 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Это единственный уцелевший заказ который я с опаской но закончила Все кто поддержал травлю, репостил и публично желал мне смерти, никому ничё делать не буду :), вы моральные уроды😘

custom 530757808167691763611custom 53260449506960421375

6 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC56 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Очень смешно как люди открыто желают мне смерти, лю вас💕

custom 52244262435160412696custom 52492241305526740013

3 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC87 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Извините пожалуйста за двойные стандарты, но если вам не всё равно на моё творчество, вы можете поддержать меня и скинуть пару деревянных на новый жёсткий диск Если всё же решите сжалится, я сделаю вам рендер, любую работу в 3D, в знак благодарности, рисовать я особо не умею 2202206254519148 (Сбер) +79811519642 (Сбер, ВТБ, Т-Банк) Также есть PayPal: Torres Cesar [email protected]

custom 53260449506960421373

3 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC85 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Можете смело отписываться от этого ТГК. Только что произошла самая неприятная ситуация в моей жизни. У меня сдох жёсткий диск размером 2ТБ с жутким предсмертным писком, а это необратимо кануло в лету 80% моего творчества, моих моделей, моих наработок, проектов, заказов и полезных программ. Нет, диск не восстановить, он сдох физически (не плата). Сама механическая часть, (магнитные пластины), не крутятся и система н

custom 522442624351604126918

1 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC80 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я кнш не сравниваю себя ни с каким персонажем, но может вы видите во мне кого-то? Мне просто очень интересно 🥲

22 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC173 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

э ну... да, я прошёл, поздравьте?🥲

custom 530757808167691763614custom 53102245675102704862custom 53257627455748913912

16 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC196 views16 reactions10 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

3D тоже искусство решила принять участие в арт среде от Nerds и мою работу уже успели обвинить в ИИ🙂

custom 532604495069604213716

3 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC212 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пустила её на аукцион, уверена что её никто не купит🤔

custom 53102245675102704867

1 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC190 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ладно, никому не интересно смотреть на мои скриншоты, вот вам будущий адопт🤨

custom 53102245675102704869custom 53260449506960421378custom 53075780816769176362

1 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC165 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Извините, постов нету, админ открыл для себя фоторежим в киберпанке🤔 Из-за низких настроек графики (potato pc), работы не выходят такими, как я хочу их видеть, а 3 источника освещения что даются игрой, особо положение не спасают🥲

custom 52244262435160412695custom 53102245675102704863custom 53260449506960421372

25 Jun 2026, 21:58 UTC158 views17 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

"Уф, ну и жарища, да?" у Руби сегодня день рожденья, 5 лет назад я получила текстуры в подарок, и она стала моей временной основой и до сих пор я с ней не расставалась

custom 53260449506960421379custom 53075780816769176364custom 53102245675102704862custom 53257627455748913912

25 Jun 2026, 15:31 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Подвожу итоги лоты Победитель: @sharunel Перса в личку и пожелания по рендеру спасибо всем за участие (потом я эти 2 поста удалю)

custom 53102245675102704865

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Sly_Foxx422. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 706,555 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sly_Foxx42” (@Sly_Foxx422), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sly_Foxx422.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.