Channel
@SluzzyCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
643subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001514293406 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SluzzyCalls |
| Description | Twitter:- https://x.com/SluzzyGems Contact for Marketing / Calls - @SluzzyGems |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SluzzyCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 643 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 643 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
397 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 263 | 66.2% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 9.32% | |
| 🫡 | 27 | 6.80% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 3.53% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 3.27% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 3.02% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 1.76% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 😐 | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 1.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2024 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
9 out of 18 Fed members just voted for a rate HIKE 💀 Last time rates went up unexpectedly — Bitcoin dropped 30% in 30 days We're at $64K right now Do the math ser 👀 Not a prediction. Just history.
Bitcoin just slipped below its 200-week moving average 💀 Historically — buying BTC below this level has returned 100%+ median gains It has NEVER happened more than twice in a row This is either the best setup of 2026 Or history is about to break 👀
Crowed is scared Smart ones are loading up quietly Dont follow noice ! Follow conviction
❤12🫡4
https://x.com/global_pressure/status/1965060800797938154?s=46 This is going to be a massive launch on bonk.fun Keep eyes on this 👀
❤5💔1
$BONK going nuts almost generating 50% of its FDV in just 24h volume for comparison - DOGE doing "only" ~10% of its FDV majority still sidelined on the little brother
❤10👍6🔥5
So the market is currently fucked up Just don't panic Stay strong and have a bullish mindset !
❤8🔥4🫡4👍1
Sluzzy Calls pinned «guys there is some scams going around using my name and fake telegrams remember this is my ONLY telegram channel I have NO paid groups you can check my twitter @Sluzzygems and @SluzzyGems + @Sluzzycalls on TG and press on the link in my bio to see the…»
guys there is some scams going around using my name and fake telegrams remember this is my ONLY telegram channel I have NO paid groups you can check my twitter @Sluzzygems and @SluzzyGems + @Sluzzycalls on TG and press on the link in my bio to see the telegram channel it will link to this channel (my ONLY channel) don’t get scammed by retards please
❤10🫡4
Solana is at 168$ Are we buying or what
💔6❤5😐5
Who is selling Please stop it Market is bleeding now
😭7💔5
GM btw
❤7🤝5
Wtf I forgot i have a TG too I need to start posting something here
❤6🤣4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SluzzyCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sluzzy Calls” (@SluzzyCalls), 643 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SluzzyCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.