Минус одна минута? https://t.me/PrimeRashy/1381
Signed zloym
Channel
@SlidingTackle
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
393subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001367221501 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SlidingTackle |
| Description | Это Погба в Подкате, мы делаем смешно. Но не всегда. И не всем. Авторский блог про английскую премьер лигу, Манчестер Юнайтед, футбол и похмелье 🌚 Чат где публично осуждают админов: @TalkingPogba Претензии, гнев, исповедь: t.me/zloym93 |
| Created | 19 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SlidingTackle |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 393 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 393 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Минус одна минута? https://t.me/PrimeRashy/1381
Signed zloym
Давно мы что-то тренеров на третий сезон не увольняли да
Signed zloym
Щас бы итальянскую оперу в английских театрах включать
Signed zloym
Отвлечемся от новостей и сгорим из-за тупых банов. Я давно подписан на Кирилла (как и на многих других болельщиков клубов АПЛ, это удобно), у него отличный канал не только про «Челси». https://t.me/breakevens2/307 Больше всего меня тригерит избирательность банов и спасение своих. Условным комментаторам «Матч ТВ», которые выкладывают такие же куски трансляции, как и все мы, никогда не прилетит – хотя они тоже не име…
Signed zloym
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed zloym
Кого уволят первым?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed zloym
ЭДИЧКА РОДНОЙ https://t.me/dimashokha/203
Signed zloym
Стрела прилетела откуда не ждали 🗿
Signed zloym
Всю ночь, двумя пальцами одной руки, делал мем в поддержку тренерского штаба. Не увольняйте рыбака(
Signed zloym
❤️ В семье Акинфенвы все поддерживают друг друга, но это не точно. @football_regista
Signed zloym
Закройте Антонио, мне дует https://t.me/PrimeRashy/1376
Signed zloym
Человек-Паук: пятёрочка у дома 🌝 Via @primeRashy
Signed zloym
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SlidingTackle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого уволят первым?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2021 to 26 October 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 784,958 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SlidingTackle named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Погба под копирайтом” (@SlidingTackle), 393 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SlidingTackle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.