Channel
@Skittsw
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
124subscribers
+119 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002916252166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Skittsw |
| Description | связь с влд :: @CatSkittles 1 админ :: @Yurchka_l 2 админ :: @gohanxw 3 админ :: @spinosaurrs магазин:https://t.me/shopskitsl начало: 06.08.26(август) ﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ Цель - 100 подписчиков сдесь Цель - 150 подписчиков в тик токе ﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ |
| Created | 6 September 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Skittsw |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
@Skittsw was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 14:22 | 124 | no change |
| 12 Nov 2026, 13:47 | 124 | +119 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 5 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 5 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (6 September 2025 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 774 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
65 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 19 | 29.2% | |
| custom 5434084977581005882 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5436081085106654422 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5435910248487487423 | 8 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5440761822070219445 | 7 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5440910642687029789 | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| custom 5436092247726658025 | 1 | 1.54% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Skittsw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2025 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
какие артики уже нарисовали, спасибо очень красиво #артик #скитлс
custom 54409106426870297893custom 54340849775810058821custom 54360810851066544221custom 54407618220702194451
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
୧・С кем из пони-блогеров вы меня шипперите? ♡ Новая рубрика! Жду ваши шипы в комментариях ୧・небольшие уточнения: — пишите имя блогера или отмечайте его — можно предлагать несколько вариантов — не стесняйтесь необычных шипов :3 — только без негатива ♡ #скитлс
custom 54340849775810058822custom 54360810851066544221
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54359102484874874232
Signed Девушка
Мне сняли гипс,но палец все еще болит если его сгибать #ёша
custom 54359102484874874232
Signed Девушка
FA𐌺E 𑀝𐌏𑀉𑀉AB ! д᧐ʙн᧐ ᥊᧐ᴛᥱ᧘ᥲ нᥲρᥙᥴ᧐ʙᥲᴛь ᴛᥲκ᧐ᥱ д᧘я ʙᥲᥴ, н᧐ нᥱ κᥲκ ρуκᥙ нᥱ д᧐᥊᧐дᥙ᧘ᥙ, ρᥱɯᥙ᧘ᥲ ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲᴛь ᥰ᧐ ᴛᥲκ᧐ᥔ ᥰρᥙκ᧐᧘ьн᧐ᥔ δᥲᤋᥱ, δуду ρᥲдᥲ κᥲжд᧐ⲙу ᥲρᴛᥙκу ;3 ʙ ɸᥲᥔ᧘ᥱ ʙᥴᥱ δудᥱᴛ ᧐ᴛᥰρᥲʙ᧘ᥱн᧐ ᥰ᧐д ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ᧐ⲙ ʙ κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥲρᥙя᥊.делаете конечно по желанию ! удᥲчᥙ! #скитлс #fake_collab@Skittsw
💘1custom 54407618220702194451
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54407618220702194453💘1custom 54340849775810058821
Signed Девушка
Блять я своими культяпками тыкаю куда попало и другие фотки отправляю #ёша
💘1custom 54409106426870297891
Signed Девушка
интересно будет почитать ваше мнение ! #интерактив #скитлс
💘1custom 54409106426870297891
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
заказ для @Rolan_Makoto за 70 💿 #артик
custom 54340849775810058822💘1
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
Артик отдан!
custom 54359102484874874233🍓2custom 54360922477266580251
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
дорисовала Артик для победителя, к сожалению я потеряла ЛС этого человека, так что прошу отписаться мне в ЛС или директ за артиком ;3 #артик #скитлс
custom 54360810851066544223🍓1💘1custom 54340849775810058821
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
୧・ небольшое объявление!! Скитлс и Папайя больше не канон, у Скитлс больше нет пары. Это было моё личное решение, никак не связанное с нашим общением. Я просто поняла, что хочу немного изменить историю Скитлс и развивать её в другом направлении. Возможно, в будущем вы увидите что-то новое! Конечно же, я совершенно ничего не имею против Папайи. Мы всё обсудили, и я надеюсь, что вы отнесётесь к этому решению с понима…
custom 54360810851066544225custom 54407618220702194452custom 54409106426870297891
Signed 〃˖ L!ziwq ౨ৎ ˖ || skittles
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Skittsw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Уᥰᥲκ᧐ʙκᥲ ᧐ᴛ 𑀝κᥙᴛ᧘ᥴ(млп)” (@Skittsw), 124 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Skittsw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.