Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nisāʾ min Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ

Channel

Nisāʾ min Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ

@SiyarAlNisa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004335637803
TypeChannel
Username@SiyarAlNisa
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SiyarAlNisa

Growth

3112 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 31 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 18:45 — 31 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 07:3012 Aug 2026, 18:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:4531no change
12 Aug 2026, 07:3031first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.5%
avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total400
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026

368 – Bint Zaʿbal: Umm al-Khayr Fātimah bint ʿAlī The shaykhah, scholar, al-muqriʾah, righteous, long-lived woman and chief hadith transmitter of Nishapur, Umm al-Khayr Fātimah bint ʿAlī ibn Muzaffar ibn al-Hasan ibn Zaʿbal ibn ʿAjlān al-Baghdādiyyah, then al-Naysābūriyyah. She was born in 435 AH. She heard hadith from Abd al-Ghafir al-Farisi and she was the last person to narrate from him. Abu Saʿd al-Samʿānī sa

5 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC20 viewsread 12 August 2026

292 – Fātimah bint ʿAbdullāh ibn Ahmad ibn al-Qāsim ibn ʿAqīl The long-lived, righteous musnidah of her time; known as Umm Ibrāhīm, Umm al-Ghayth and Umm al-Khayr al-Jūzdāniyyah al-Isbahāniyyah. She was the last person in the world to transmit narrations from Ibn Rīdhah and she narrated extensively from him. The following people narrated from her: Abu al-ʿAlāʾ al-ʿAttār, Abu Musa al-Madini, Maʿmar ibn al-Fākhir, A

5 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026

352 – Khadījah bint Ahmad ibn al-Hasan ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Nahrawānī Fakhr al-Nisāʾ, bint al-Nahrawānī, was a righteous woman who lived to an advanced age. She narrated from Ibn Talhah al-Niʿālī. Those who narrated from her include her nephew, ʿAlī ibn Rūh, Shaykh al-Muwaffaq, Nasr ibn ʿAbd al-Razzāq, Shaykh al-ʿImād al-Maqdisī and others. She died in Ramadān of the year 570 AH. The last surviving person among

4 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

351 – Tajannī bint ʿAbdullāh, Umm ʿUtb al-Wahbāniyyah The ʿatīqah of Abū al-Makārim ibn Wahbān. She was the last person in Baghdad, in terms of date of death, who had heard hadith from Tirād al-Zaynabī and Abū ʿAbdullāh ibn Talhah al-Niʿālī. Those who narrated from her include al-Samʿānī, Ibn ʿAsākir, Shaykh al-Muwaffaq, al-Nāsih ibn al-Hanbalī, Bahāʾ al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Rahmān, Abū al-Futūh ibn al-Husrī, Hibat Allāh i

3 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC22 viewsread 12 August 2026

344 – Shuhdah bint al-muhaddith Abū Nasr Ahmad ibn al-Faraj al-Dīnawarī Then al-Baghdādiyyah, of the Ibari family, the long-lived woman, calligrapher and writer, the musnidah of Iraq and the pride of women. She was born after the year 480 AH. She heard hadith from Abū al-Fawāris Tirād al-Zaynabī, Ibn Talhah al-Niʿālī, Abū al-Hasan ibn Ayyūb, Abū al-Khattāb ibn al-Batr, ʿAbd al-Wāhid ibn ʿUlwān, Ahmad ibn ʿAbd al-Q

2 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC22 viewsread 12 August 2026

307 – Nafīsah Fātimah bint Muhammad ibn ʿAlī al-Bazzāzah al-Baghdādiyyah She is also referred to as Fātimah bint Muhammad ibn ʿAlī al-Bazzāzah al-Baghdādiyyah, the sister of Abū al-Faraj ibn al-Bazzāzah. She heard hadith from Tirād al-Zaynabī and Ibn Talhah al-Niʿālī. Those who narrated from her include the hāfiz ʿAbd al-Ghanī, Shaykh al-Muwaffaq, Abū Ishāq al-Kāshgharī and a number of others. Among the earlier sc

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SiyarAlNisa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 307,091 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nisāʾ min Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ” (@SiyarAlNisa), 31 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SiyarAlNisa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.