Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

007𝚗7 𝚂𝚆𝙰𝙶

@SixSeven_SwagBlog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003735115770
TypeChannel
Username@SixSeven_SwagBlog
Descriptionсвег
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SixSeven_SwagBlog

Growth

608 August 2026 — 60 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:1660no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:3260first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.2%
avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total746
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
2
Links
21

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52470076396651294261926.4%
custom 53347129634985162511520.8%
custom 52697372508406488281419.4%
custom 601016745063980026579.72%
custom 546738980755657900568.33%
custom 530120705174408306145.56%
custom 530329559555587336545.56%
🔥22.78%
custom 524257369581738207311.39%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 Севен довольный изчез в портале и сразу же завалился на свою дакимакуру с Макимой. 🖍🖍🔤🔤 уверен, что ей нравлюсь, да, родная? 🖍🖍 Он погладил подушку, утыкаясь в напечатанные на ткани сиськи. 🖍🖍🔤🔤на не сможет передо мной устоять! 🔤 всë сделаю идеально. 🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

9 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC19 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🖍🖍🔤🔤а! 🔤сего одно свидание! 🔤ы ни о чëм не пожалеешь! 🔤 сделаю всë в лучшем виде!! 🔤онна! 🔤олько согласись пожалуйста!! 🔤отом можешь делать со мной всë, что угодно! 🔤 стану твоим псом и буду есть из собачьей миски, ты сможешь меня выгуливать, я буду ходить за тобой на четвереньках и гавкать по твоему приказу!! 🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

custom 52697372508406488281custom 53347129634985162511custom 54673898075565790051

9 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC19 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🧑‍🔧:: мне очень нравится ваша реакция на это, не спешите ужасаться!! мальчик впервые женщину реальную увидел и даже потрогал, у него башню снесло

custom 53012070517440830614custom 53032955955558733654custom 52470076396651294262custom 52697372508406488281custom 54673898075565790051

9 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC20 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 Севен покраснел ещë больше, не из за ударов даже. Он возбудился и потëк. С разбитым носом, синяком под глазом и качающимся зубом. Он был так счастлив. А то, как Донна схватила его за рога! За его чувствительное место! Она всегда знает, что он хочет! 🖍🖍🔤🔤оя любимая Донна...🔤ы так прекрасны..🔤пасибо, что снизошли и тронули такого червя как я! 🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

custom 52470076396651294266custom 53347129634985162515custom 52697372508406488283

9 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC25 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🧑‍🔧:: с каждым постом всë дальше от бога, храни нас всех Теламон и фаер ринг🙏

9 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC19 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🖍🖍🔤🔤ет, Донна!!! 🔤е блокируй меня, Донна, боже..можешь избить меня, можешь разбить мне голову о стол, я тебя любить не перестану, Донна!! 🔤оя милая цундерочка..боже как ты прекрасна, Донна...🖍🖍 Не выдержав такого ужасного поступка, Севен вылез половиной тела прямо в чужом кабинете. Весь красный, растрëпанный и с капающей слюной с уголка рта. Если бы такое было возможно, то его взгляд был бы на

custom 52697372508406488281custom 53347129634985162511custom 60101674506398002651

9 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC19 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🖍🖍🔤🔤а..говори мне это чаще своим надменным голосом..боже..ммх..как же ты хороша, Доннаа..!🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

custom 52470076396651294264custom 53347129634985162513custom 52697372508406488281

9 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC20 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🖍🖍🔤🔤ебе не обязательно куда то идти!! 🔤 сам прийти могу!! 🔤 ничего не разрушу, честно-честно! 🔤онна, пожалуйста!! 🔤 всë что угодно сделать готов, чтобы ты наступила на ме...э..сходила на свидание!! 🔤 буду целовать землю по которой ты ходишь, Донна!!!🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

custom 52470076396651294261custom 52697372508406488281custom 53347129634985162511

9 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🖍🖍🔤🔤ет, Донна..ты..ты..ээ..ппп...правда..очень красивая.. 🔤.. очень хочу сс...сс...с тобой сходить на с..свидание..🔤ы мне...очень нравишься..и твои си..си..ээээ..ДУША очень н..нравятся..да..🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

custom 52470076396651294263custom 52697372508406488282custom 53347129634985162511

9 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC22 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🖍🖍🔤🔤онна, ну пожалуйста!!! 🔤ходи со мной на свидание!! 🔤 правда помоюсь!!! 🔤орошо оденусь!!! 🔤ОЖАЛУЙСТА Я ТЕБЯ УМОЛЯЮ, Я НА КОЛЕНИ ВСТАНУ ДОННА Я БУДУ ТВОИ ПЯТКИ ЛИЗАТЬ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА ДОННАААААА!!!!!!🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

custom 52470076396651294263custom 53347129634985162512custom 54673898075565790051

9 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🖍🖍🔤🔤 когда он..а..перестанет винить меня во всех своих проблемах..? 🔤орого..ая..Донна..уж кто кто, а точно не я таким бредом занимаюсь. 🔤елать мне больше нечего.. 🔤отя сейчас ты привлекательна как никогда..давай сходим на свидание???🖍🖍 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

custom 54673898075565790051

31 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖍~007𝚗7 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛~🖍🖍 🖍🖍🖍 🧑‍🔧:: ищу саппа Теламона пиши я Мне в укуренном бреду пришла идея НЕЕБЕЙШЕЙ предыстории взаимоотношения этих пидорасиков. И мне нужно с кем то из Теламонов/Шедлецких договориться устроить конфликт (и интеракт на этой почве). Чо если Севен надел скин БрайтАйс и оприходовал Теламона. После Теламон об этом узнал и обозлился на Севена не только за разрушения но и на эту хуйню :D Если тут есть Телам

custom 52697372508406488282

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SixSeven_SwagBlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 97,299 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“007𝚗7 𝚂𝚆𝙰𝙶” (@SixSeven_SwagBlog), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SixSeven_SwagBlog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.