Channel
@Sistani313Najaf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
926subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001374801323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sistani313Najaf |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sistani313Najaf |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 926 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 929 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 931 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 930 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 July 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 377 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
427 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 348 | 81.5% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 5.85% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 3.75% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 3.04% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 1.87% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.468% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.468% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.234% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.234% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.234% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الإيمان بإمامة صاحب الزمان - معيار الوصف الحسيني فكل من آمن بالقائم المنتظر وله بيعة في عنقه له فهو الحسني الحسيني ... عقيدةً وفكراً ومنهاجاً 🤚 وكل ما عدى ذلك فإنه أضغاث أحلام عنده صاحبها
❤11👏1🙏1
اللهم بحق يومنا المبارك هذا ... وبحق أهل بيت نبيك الطاهرين عليهم السلام أن تمد في عمر مرجعنا المفدى السيد السيستاني بخير وعافية وأن تجعلنا له طائعين ولنهجه حافظين وبإرشاده عاملين حتى نحظى بلطف عناية صاحب الزمان "عجل الله فرجه " فإنه حُجَّةُ الحُجَّةِ علينا
❤36🥰2🤩1🙏1
النص أعلاه عن الحسن بن عطية عن الإمام جعفر الصادق عليه السلام ... كامل الزيارات أخاف واحد يجي يعترض ... لأن عنده كم صنم جاحد بولايتهم مخالف لهم قد أدخله بحريم شيعتهم
❤15👍2🥰1
لا يعتبر في #الولاية_الإيمانية الاستقامة في العمل هذا والذي يظهر من النصوص المختلفة أن #ولاية_الإيمان لا تتوقف على الاستقامة في العمل. بل معيارها الإسلام و ولاية الأئمة من أهل البيت (عليهم السلام). وهو مقتضى إطلاق نصوص الموالاة وجعل الموضوع في بعضها وصف هذا الأمر وفي بعضها محبّنا وفي بعضها من تعلق بحبلنا ... إلى غير ذلك. بل صرح بالعموم في جملة من النصوص. منها ما رواه الشيخ الطوسي "قدس" بسنده عن زيد بن يونس الشحام …
❤13🕊1🥰1
الاستخفاف بكلام المعصومين عليهم السلام ‼️ إيّاك أن يغُرَّك حالك فيحملك الغرور على أن تجعل كلام المعصومين عليهم السلام عُرضةً لجهلك وسخريتك فمهما كنت صائمًا قائمًا مجاهدًا وفي الصفوف الأولى فإنّ العبرة ليست بكثرة العمل وخطورته وإنما بالإيمان عن بصيرة والتسليم لأمرهم، والولاية لهم، والبغض لأعدائهم. بعض هولاء يتهكّم على غالبية الشيعة الملتزمين بنهج آل محمد عليهم السلام ويصنفهم بأنهم متخاذلون ويصفهم بـ « #أحلاس_البيوت»…
❤14👍3🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
المرجع الأعلى السيد #السيستاني " مد ظله المبارك " يؤكد على تعليم الصبيان لأحاديث آل محمد عليهم السلام { ومنه يظهر السر في تأكيد الأئمة عليهم السلام على ضرورة تعليم الصبيان أحاديث أهل البيت عليهم السلام : قبل الإطلاع على غيرها فإن الصبي إذا استأنس بأحاديث أهل البيت عليهم السلام وتركزت أفكارهم ومعتقداتهم في ذهنه فإنه لا يتأثر بعده بأفكار المذاهب والتيارات والمبادئ الأخرى وستصونه مرتكزاته عن الإنحراف أما لو تركزت في …
❤26🥰1
بعضهم عندما يمر على روايات الولاية لآل محمد عليهم السلام وبيان مقامهم ولزوم أتباعهم وفضل شيعتهم بولايتهم وإيمانهم يقول : هذا غير معقول وذاك غير مقبول وهذا لا يصلح وهذا لا يستقيم ويبدأ يتفلسف ويلوي عنق النص حتى يشكك بكلام المعصوم من أجل تقديم كلامه على مراد كلام حجة الله الإمام الصادق عليه السلام يقول : الويل لهؤلاء لأنهم يتركون ما نقول ويذهبون إلى ما يريدون. إليك محل الشاهد من الرواية لأنها طويلة : 💠 ورد في الكاف…
❤6👍2🙏2🥰1
شهادة المعصوم عليه السلام بحق أصحاب سيد الشهداء عليه السلام : [[ أشهدُ لقد كُشِفَ لكم الغِطَاء ... وكنتم عن الحقِّ غيرَ بِطاءٍ ]] بعد أن علم الله تعالى من أصحاب سيد الشهداء الإيمان الكامل والتسليم المطلق والعزم على نصرة إمامهم ... كشف لهم الغطاء ولم يكن موقفهم مجرد النصرة كما يزعم أهل التخبط قصيري الفهم
❤11👍1
تردّ على انحرافاته العقائدية والتاريخية يجاوبك : مو هو وكيل السيد «قدس»...‼️ عزيزي أنت تدري أن أبا حمزة البطائني لعن الله كان وكيلاً للإمام الكاظم عليه السلام ثم انحرف عن ولايتهم فالحق لا يُعرف بالرجال ... اعرف الحق تعرف أهله. ولاية الأئمة محور الدين ورأس الإيمان ومفازة الجنان. وكل من زهد فيها أو جعلها هامشية في معتقده، فإنه إما قصير الفهم، أو سوء عاقبة أدركته وفضحته.
❤22🥰1
جعلنا الله وإياكم من أهل البصيرة والثبات على ولايتهم ورزقنا الله حسن العاقبة والبراءة من عدوهم من الإنس والجن
❤15🙏2👌1🥰1
الإمام المعصوم عليه السلام يقول : ثم ينفروا إلينا فيعلمونا ولايتهم ويعرضون علينا نصرتهم آل محمد ... آل محمد ... إلينا ... إلينا
❤21🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sistani313Najaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“السيستاني مرجعنا - 313” (@Sistani313Najaf), 926 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sistani313Najaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.