Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sickipedia

@Sickipedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,879subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000798864
TypeChannel
Username@Sickipedia
Created18 October 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sickipedia

Growth

11,87911,90311,8915 August 2026 — 11,903 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,901 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,902 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,894 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,892 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,887 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,883 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,879 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,875–11,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:3611,879-4
12 Aug 2026, 15:3511,883-4
11 Aug 2026, 17:4411,887-5
10 Aug 2026, 14:2511,892-2
9 Aug 2026, 12:3311,894-4
8 Aug 2026, 11:0411,898-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:2411,902+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:0211,901-2
5 Aug 2026, 18:1911,903first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,172 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁40034.1%
🤣25421.7%
👏816.91%
🔥645.46%
😭524.44%
494.18%
👍494.18%
🤓383.24%
💊302.56%
🥰252.13%
🗿231.96%
🥱201.71%
🌚110.939%
🙉100.853%
👎90.768%
🙏90.768%
🤔90.768%
🤷‍♂90.768%
🌭80.683%
🖕50.427%
6 further kinds171.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,172reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 14 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2025, 06:01 UTC≈13,700 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Google announced a major breakthrough in quantum computing. This is really great news. And at the same time it's really bad news. #other@Sickipedia

😁41🤓19👍7🤷‍♂7🥱41

13 Mar 2025, 15:01 UTC≈13,600 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026

IKEA have started selling women’s underwear. Their range of bras are called stoppemfloppen. #wordplay@Sickipedia

👏225👍5🥰5👎3🔥2😁2

13 Mar 2025, 10:01 UTC≈13,700 views68 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Did you know that you can tell the sex of an ant by putting it in water If it sinks, it’s a girl ant. If it floats, it’s buoyant! #wordplay@Sickipedia

🤣32🥱16🤓7👍63🔥3🥴1

13 Mar 2025, 06:01 UTC≈12,200 views94 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Hitler went to a fortuneteller and asked her, “On what day will I die?” The seeress assured him that he would die on a Jewish holiday. “Why are you so sure of that?” demanded Hitler. “Any day,” she replied, “on which you die will be a Jewish holiday.” #oldbutgold@Sickipedia

🤣67🔥19👍4🗿21🤔1

12 Mar 2025, 15:01 UTC≈10,300 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026

My wife left me a note on the fridge saying, “This isn’t working.” I’m not quite sure what she’s talking about. I opened the fridge door, and it’s working fine! #wordplay@Sickipedia

😭2820😁11👍3🎃2🗿1

11 Mar 2025, 15:01 UTC≈9,330 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026

If I had a nickel for every woman who found me unattractive... Eventually women would find me attractive. #oldbutgold@Sickipedia

🔥40😁25🌚6👎53💯2🤓2

11 Mar 2025, 10:01 UTC≈8,760 views57 reactionsread 13 August 2026

If a deaf person has to go to court... It is still called a hearing? #wordplay@Sickipedia

😁30😭16🙉10👍1

11 Mar 2025, 06:01 UTC≈8,260 views55 reactionsread 13 August 2026

I saw a brunette walking her dogs. I asked: "What are your dogs' names?" She: "Calvin and Klein." Me: "Isn't that a brand of underwear?" She: "Exactly, they're boxers." #wordplay@Sickipedia

😁41👏7👍4🤓2😭1

10 Mar 2025, 15:01 UTC≈6,920 views61 reactionsread 13 August 2026

A guy walks into the bank, pulls out a gun, points it at the teller and screams, “Give me all your money or you’re geography!” The teller replies, “Don’t you mean history?” The robber says, “Don’t change the subject!" #wordplay@Sickipedia

😁55🤓6

10 Mar 2025, 10:01 UTC≈6,290 views69 reactionsread 13 August 2026

What's the difference between an artist and an extra large pizza? A pizza can feed a family of 4. #oldbutgold@Sickipedia

😁21🥰17🗿11😭7🖕5😐4👍31

10 Mar 2025, 06:01 UTC≈6,200 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026

I went to the library and asked if they had any books on turtles. The librarian asked, “Hardback?” I replied, “Yes. Little heads too.” #wordplay@Sickipedia

😁27🤣10👍5👌2🥰21

9 Mar 2025, 15:01 UTC≈5,640 views42 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Did you hear about the prostitute that became an accountant? It's the thot that counts. #wordplay@Sickipedia

👏21🌭8🤣8👍2🤓21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sickipedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 681,845 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sickipedia” (@Sickipedia), 11,879 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sickipedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.