با نسخهٔ اصلاحشده جایگزین شد.
❤8👍1
Signed Mohawk

Channel
@SichanSikiT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
462subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002018957466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SichanSikiT |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SichanSikiT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 462 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 465 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 464 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 464 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
526 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 167 | 31.7% | |
| ❤ | 141 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 93 | 17.7% | |
| 🥰 | 81 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 3.42% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 2.09% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 0.951% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 526reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SichanSikiT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 October 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
با نسخهٔ اصلاحشده جایگزین شد.
❤8👍1
Signed Mohawk
Here #Here #Comic @SichanSikiT
❤12👍1
Signed Mohawk
سیچانسیکی با افتخار تقدیم میکند ترجمهٔ کمیک اینجا | here از ریچارد مگوایر داستان کمیک (نسخه ۱۹۸۹) این کمیک کوتاه تنها روی یک نقطه ثابت از یک اتاق تمرکز دارد و زمان را در آن فضا متلاشی میکند. مگوایر با استفاده از پنجرههای کوچکِ (پنلهای) لایهبندیشده درون تصویر اصلی، سالهای مختلف را همزمان نشان میدهد؛ مثلاً در یک صفحه، فضای سال ۱۹۵۷ را میبینیم، در حالی که پنجرهای کوچک در گوشه تصویر، اتفاقی در سال ۱۹۹۹ و پن…
❤20👍1
Signed Mohawk
نکتهای کوتاه در بارهٔ این اثر و چرایی انتشارش به این شکل: بنده ترجمک این کمیکچه را خیلی وقت پیش انجام داده بودم و در جایی که مخصوص کارهای انفرادیام بود منتشر کرده بودم. کاری که بنظرم اشتباه بود زیرا هم موجب کمتر دیده شدن اثر شد و دسترسی به آن را سخت کرد و هم اینکه برای بنده مدیریت کار سختتر شد. از این پس آن چنل منحل میشود و تمام کارها چه انفرادی و چه تیمی در همین چنل منتشر میشود، ممنون از توجهتان به این موضوع.…
❤16
Signed Mohawk
#Death_Talks_About_Life #the_Sandman @SichanSikiT
❤4
Signed Mohawk
مرگ سخن میگوید در باب زندگی Death Talks About Life نویسنده: نیل گیمن تصویرگر: دیو مککین مترجم، متننگار و متنزدا: موهاک خلاصه: در این کمیک، کاراکتر مرگ با لحنی آرام و دوستانه، اما بسیار جدی و مستقیم، به خواننده میآموزد که سکس میتواند لذتبخش باشد، اما نباید به خاطر آن جان خود را به خطر انداخت. او بر استفاده از عقل سلیم و ابزارهای ایمنی مثل کاندوم تاکید میکند و میگوید که یکی از مهمترین عواقب سکس ناایمن، عل…
❤14
Signed Mohawk
سال نوی میلادی بر شما فرخنده باد. امیدوارم سالی پر از زیبایی و خوشی و جیب پرپول داشته باشید.
❤22🔥1
Signed Mohawk
کریسمس هم مبارک به همین مناسبت آمار چنل کوچک ما رو هم داشته باشید. @SichanSikiT #telemetrio2025
🥰38❤3🔥1
Signed Mohawk
خب مثل اینکه جواب داد و تیمشون عذرخواهی کرد و نسخه اصلی رو گذاشت ولی مسئله اینه که اولاً چرا اصلا از اول این کار رو کردن که الان بعد ۶ ماه بیان برای عذرخواهی بعدشم اینکه این رو درست کردن معلوم نیست آیا از تیمهای دیگه هم دزدی به عمل آوردن یا نه. بهتر هم بود متن عذرخواهی رو به جای دایرکت چنل همین زیر کامنت میکردن همه بازخورد داشته باشن، کل مخاطبان. به هرحال جای شکرش باقیه که عذرخواهی به عمل اومد و فایل رو تعویض ک…
👍15🥰6🔥2❤1🙏1
Signed Mohawk
https://gameeroid.com/96582/the-shadows-that-run-alongside-our-car/ این آدرس سایت و صفحه دانلود اینم تصاویر
💔20❤6🔥1
Signed Mohawk
خب دوستان امروز متوجه نکته جالب توجهی شدم مثل اینکه یکی از وبسایتهای محترم دانلود اپلیکیشن و بازی اندروید برداشته و این بازی رو در وبسایتش قرار داده. ولی مشکل این جاست که وقتی صفحه دانلود رو چک میکنی میبینی که خبری از اسم ما به عنوان مترجم اثر نیست. با خودت میگی خیلی خوب، لابد لوگوی سیچانسیکی توی بازی هنوز هست دیگه. میری بازی رو دانلود میکنی میبینی اوا، چیشد، سایت اشتراکی بود. چرا باید چیزی که رایگان منتشر…
💔52❤2🔥1
Signed Mohawk
تیم سیچانسیکی فرا رسیدن شب یلدا را بر همگان تبریک میگوید. امیدواریم همیشه و همهجا پایا و خوشحال باشید. شب یلدا مبارک.
🥰37🔥2😁2
Signed Mohawk
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SichanSikiT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 541,828 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SiçanSiki TEAM” (@SichanSikiT), 462 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SichanSikiT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.