STEP ON US 🧎🏻♀➡️

Channel
SHUCIATION!
@Shuuciation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
380subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001219168526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Shuuciation |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Shuuciation |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 380 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 383 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 383 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2024 to 23 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
Happy 26th birthday to our lovely, talented, beautiful, gifted, sweet, charming, humble, graceful, kind hearted, elegant, enchanting, genuine, warm, bright and endlessly charismatic Shuhua!
It’s Shuhua Day! 💛
#ShiningStarShuhua!
ㅤ ㅤㅤ 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐂𝐀𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐎𝐑𝐍 ㅤㅤ𝘈 𝘓𝘶𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘓𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘛𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘺-𝘴𝘪𝘹 ㅤㅤ New Chapter: #𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐒𝐡𝐮𝐡𝐮𝐚 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ☆ ㅤ · ㅤ ☆ The hours do fold themselves about her, whilst-time long sovereign and seldom still in contemplative arrest, beholding the workmanship of its own long labour. Six-and-twenty years are now disposed into a mild firmament, each a vow inscribed toward the woman who remaineth still, at t
🤍
💘1
Happy Shuhua Day!
💋1
Jangan lupa pakaaaii ♥
#Shuhua25thEdition
ㅤ 👛UNDER THE NEON LIGHTS, SHE GLOWS. SHINE ON! 👛 AS THE STAR OF THE SHOW... 6th of January: Y2K IT GIRL DAY ✨ Confidence? Check. Charm? Double check. 💋 With a strut that turns heads and a vibe that lights up the room, she’s here to remind us what it means to own the moment. Effortlessly chic, unapologetically bold— she’s the woman everyone wants to be and the friend everyon…
Happy mensive!
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Shuuciation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 300,472 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@wooekly · 712 postsTADJIS
@tadjis · 237 postsCathartic Yoon.
@CatharticYoon · 115 postsThe Eerie Splendid Folk, Groeneveld.
@GroeneveId · 853 postsZachruelle Family; Adventure in Pooh's World.
@TheZachruelle · 14,0933 postsRojen Archive.
@RojenFiles · 72 postsCrimstor's Repository.
@Crimsitory · 71 postArchive
@dearute · 101 post[CLOSE SFS] ELDRAETH: Ebon Swan's Eternal Manor.
@eldraeth · 9,2501 postDenken, Durven, Doen; Echo Ridge University.
@EridgeUniversity · 2721 postLabyrinth Queens : GIRLIDLE Legacy.
@GlRLIDLE · 191 postSchool Archive
@izschoolchive · 91 postDreamixx﹔Beautical Sonar.
@nmixxversee · 141 postRising-Eight.
@risingeight · 1091 postSouthmixx, DISS.
@Southmixx · 521 postVenture Karina’s
@Venturinas · 101 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Shuuciation named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SHUCIATION!” (@Shuuciation), 380 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shuuciation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.