Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌏 پی‌نوشت‌ها / شعیب بهمن

@ShuaibBahman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

342subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090861872
TypeChannel
Username@ShuaibBahman
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShuaibBahman

Growth

3343423386 August 2026 — 334 subscribers6 August 2026 — 334 subscribers14 August 2026 — 342 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 333–343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:18342+8
6 Aug 2026, 21:46334no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:36334first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.7%
avg views ÷ 342 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,563
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1045.5%
522.7%
🤬522.7%
👎29.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC25 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rahbordemoaserPhoto

🔹کنوانسیون دریای خزر در راستای منافع ملی است؟ ▫️گفت‌و‌گوی شعیب بهمن؛ کارشناس مسائل بین‌الملل با «راهبرد معاصر» را در لینک زیر بخوانید. rahbordemoaser.ir/fa/news/314987 @RahbordeMoaser

5 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC32 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌐هشدار رئیس «موسسه مطالعات جهان معاصر» و پژوهشگر ارشد اوراسیا در گفتگو با قدس لایحه خزر پروژه زنگزور را کامل نکند تصویب کنوانسیون خزر پیش از تعیین مرزها به زیان ایران است / خطر کاهش سهم ایران از خزر جدی است به‌گزارش قدس آنلاین، چهارشنبه ۳۱ تیر و در بحبوحه توجه و تمرکز افکار عمومی و رسانه‌ها بر جنوب و خلیج فارس، هیئت دولت مصوبه‌ای درباره پهنه آبی شمال کشور از سر گذراند؛ لایحه «کنوانسیون وضعیت حقوقی دریای خزر» که در

3👎1

4 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC40 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @khate_energyVideo

🔥امضای پزشکیان برای تامین انرژی زنگزور! 🔹شعیب بهمن: پیش از کنوانسیون رژیم حقوقی دریای کاسپین، ترکمنستان و قزاقستان برای صادرات نفت و گاز ناچار به استفاده از مسیر ایران یا روسیه بودند اما اکنون امکان احداث خطوط لوله در بستر خزر فراهم شده. 🔹با اجرای پروژه ترانس‌خزر و اتصال آن به کریدور گاز جنوبی و همچنین پیش‌بینی خطوط انرژی در کریدور زنگزور، ایران از بخشی از منافع ژئوپلیتیکی و ترانزیتی خود در انتقال انرژی به اروپا مح

1

4 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC89 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

پیوستگی کنوانسیون کاسپین با کریدور جعلی زنگزور یا همان مسیر ترامپ و تکمیل پازل #خفگی_ژئوپلیتیکی ایران 🌐@ShuaibBahman

4 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC41 viewsread 6 August 2026

پروژه کاسپین؛ تقاطع سه جریان پنهان در پشت پرده تصویب فارغ از ابعاد فنی، حقوقی و ژئوپلیتیک آن، در واقع به یک کلاف سردرگم از منافع و اهداف چندگانه گره خورده است که فراتر از یک تصمیمِ صرفاً دولتی عمل می‌کند. برای درک صحیح از روند فشار برای تصویب این سند، باید به جای تحلیل تک‌بعدی، آن را در تقاطع‌گیری سه گروه کاملاً متمایز مورد بررسی قرار داد https://dnws.ir/003Zr6 🌐@ShuaibBahman

4 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC38 viewsread 6 August 2026

💢 شعیب بهمن، کارشناس مسائل بین‌الملل در گفت‌وگو با «راهبرد معاصر» پاسخ داد: کنوانسیون دریای خزر در راستای منافع ملی است؟ شعیب بهمن، کارشناس مسائل بین‌الملل با بیان اهمیت بهره‌برداری از منابع انرژی بستر دریای خزر گفت: کنوانسیون رژیم حقوقی دریای خزر خطا‌های فنی و حقوقی در تعیین خطوط مبدأ ساحلی دارد، بنابراین می‌تواند به چالشی برای تمامیت ارضی و منافع ملی ایران مبدل شود. https://rahbordemoaser.ir/fa/news/314987/ 🌐@

3 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 6 August 2026

⚓️ پروژه کاسپین؛ تقاطع سه جریان پنهان در پشت پرده تصویب ✍ دکتر شعیب بهمن 🔑مقدمه پروژه‌ تصویب کنوانسیون رژیم حقوقی کاسپین در شرایطی که کشور درگیر جنگی سرنوشت‌ساز است و هیچ ضرورتی برای طرح چنین مسائلی- که وحدت ملی را به مخاطره می‌اندازد - وجود ندارد، فارغ از ابعاد فنی، حقوقی و ژئوپلیتیک آن، در واقع به یک کلاف سردرگم از منافع و اهداف چندگانه گره خورده است که فراتر از یک تصمیمِ صرفاً دولتی عمل می‌کند. برای درک صحیح از

3 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026

کنوانسیون دریای کاسپین؛ توجیهات واهی در برابر منافع ملی پشت پرده توجیهات موافقان کنوانسیون دریای کاسپین چیست؟ بررسی تحولات منطقه نشان می‌دهد ادعاهای واهی مطرح بیش از آنکه واقعیت داشته باشد، روایت‌هایی برای مشروعیت‌بخشی به تصمیمی بحث‌برانگیز هستند. باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان؛ شعیب بهمن مسئله تعیین رژیم حقوقی دریای کاسپین، همواره یکی از دغدغه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی جمهوری اسلامی ایران بوده است. در سال‌های اخیر، برخی حامیان تصویب

3 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC37 viewsread 6 August 2026

🌐۲ کارشناس مسائل بین‌الملل از مجلس خواستند لایحه کنوانسیون خزر را به دولت بازگرداند کنوانسیون خزر، از ابهام حقوقی تا نگرانی امنیتی 🔻جوان آنلاین: ارسال لایحه کنوانسیون وضعیت حقوقی دریای خزر از سوی دولت به مجلس شورای اسلامی، بار دیگر یکی از مهم‌ترین پرونده‌های حقوقی و ژئوپلیتیکی جمهوری اسلامی ایران را به صدر مباحث سیاسی و کارشناسی کشور بازگردانده است. در حالی که وزارت امور خارجه تصویب این کنوانسیون را گامی برای تکمیل

3 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC40 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @khate_energyVideo

🔺 اسرائیل در ۴۵ کیلومتری سواحل کاسپین! 🔹شعیب بهمن: مطابق کنوانسیون رژیم حقوقی دریای کاسپین، کشتی کشورهای خارجی و فراساحلی می‌توانند در ۴۵ کیلومتری سواحل ایران حضور نظامی داشته باشند. 🔹پیوستن ایران به این کنوانسیون، یک چالش امنیتی بزرگ برای کشور ایجاد می‌کند‌. در شرایط جنگی احتمالا حقوق بین‌الملل هم کنار رفته و کشتی‌های دشمن به ما از دریای کاسپین حمله هم می‌کنند. @khate_energy

2 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC45 viewsread 6 August 2026

🌐چرا دولت لایحه کنوانسیون خزر را در میانه جنگ به مجلس فرستاد؟ 🔈 شعیب بهمن، کارشناس مسائل بین‌الملل، با تأکید بر اینکه لایحه کنوانسیون رژیم حقوقی دریای خزر در برخی محورهای اساسی با مصوبه شورای عالی امنیت ملی مغایرت دارد و در شرایط فعلی تأمین‌کننده منافع ملی کشور نیست، از نمایندگان مجلس خواست تا پیش از رفع ابهامات حقوقی، فنی، امنیتی و تعیین تکلیف مسائل بنیادین، از بررسی و تصویب آن جلوگیری کنند. خبرگزاری فارس https:/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ShuaibBahman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 177,301 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌏 پی‌نوشت‌ها / شعیب بهمن” (@ShuaibBahman), 342 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShuaibBahman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.