#спойлер
❤1

Channel
@ShtilNaMore67
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003694186850 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShtilNaMore67 |
| Description | Данный канал ни к чему не призывает, всё исключительно с развлекательной целью |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShtilNaMore67 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 8 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 8 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (12 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 89 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
16 reactions across 13 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#спойлер
❤1
Миша при любом удобном случае, пока рядом нет Саши: #Москва #хехех
❤2
Лёша и Рахим, когда в дубак захотелось шашлыка. Вперёд ушли с таким же Гриша с Дареном, но там несёт всё, включая Дарена, Гриша.. #РостовнаДону #Астрахань #Волгоград #Краснодар #хехех
❤2
So, це я пытался передать, как ощущались дни Петербурга в ≈1920-х годах в соответствии с историческим контекстом
❤1
Когда мысли дурманят хлеще самого ядовитого дурмана, А сознание спутывает белена, На помощь из раза в раз приходила она: Свеча. Тонкая, старая, "Рухлять" слегка. Возможно, три века с ним под руку пережила. Возможно, вчерашней доставкой в бледные руки попала. Возможно, шестёркой лет назад в сомнительном киоске куплена. Течет река, Шелестит трава, Взгляд вдаль направлен без конца. Горизонт вдали, Облака ввыси, Сознание…
❤1
В первую мировую войну в Петрограде и Москве свободно продавался кoкаин. Его пропагандировали как средство от мoрфиевой и алкогольной зависимостей, от неврозов. В связи с принятием "сухого закона" в Российской Империи данная штучка, продаваемая в маленьких картонных коробочках на манер спичечных, быстро охватила спрос и свободно продавалась в аптеках за 50 копеек ( ВРОДЕ, это было вокруг да около 4 тысяч современных …
❤2
So, не одному мне понравилась эта концепция и я подумываю над созданием аушки
❤1
Долго колеблясь, Даня всё-таки отправляет сообщение отцу с текстом следующим: « — па я крч ракавину сломал у тебя пол квартиры в воде » В унисон с отправкой сообщения из кабинета травматолога донеслось заветное: — Московский! #зарисовки #Химки
❤1
Пора завязывать. Что именно? Всё. Но ашку ашкудишить — исключение, на святое не позариваемся. Жаль только, забыл её у Серёжки.. Ну, его отцу халява. Может, наконец хоть одобрит отношения его сына. И Даню в целом. Зависнув на неясный временной интервал в бело-серую глянцевую стену из мрамора Московский не сразу понял, что за треск вдруг раздался. А когда понял — было уже поздно. Раковина, вопреки гарантии на ч…
❤1
Сидя на широкой столешнице-раковине с поистине роскошной белой глянцевой облицовкой спиной к стене, дабы в до блеска начищенном химией зеркале отражалась его спина, облаченная в изящно зашнурованный черный корсет плотной шершавой ткани с витиеватыми темно-фиолетовыми рюшами, — о, сколько мук миновано в тягостных попытках зашнуровать Э Т О самому, ибо ни дай бог кто другой увидит, это не предназначено для чужих глаз, …
❤1
Мне кажется, что в наиболее прибриженном к возможному в реальности ау пвл, все города бы невъебически старались, лезя вон ни то, что из трусов, из кожи, через рот, кровь и самые тяжёлые работы, чтобы иметь какую-то свободу. ну просто, БЕССМЕРТНЫЕ ЛЮДИ 😨 ЕБАТЬ, это ж какой объект для исследований лабораторий. Это: • Бесконечный и нескончаемый источник всех органов, включая жизненно важных ( сердце, к примеру ) • О…
❤1
ХЭДЫ НА КАТУНЬ, мне понравился хэд, где она козочка, я продолжу и покидаю на этот хэд свои. Надеюсь, автор хэда не против :_3 Катунь — горная козочка с вьющейся белой шерстью. Экая модница. И она ОЧЕНЬ своенравная реченька. Прям ОЧЕНЬ. Эта мадмуазель не подпустит к себе незнакомого человека, она начнёт максимально недружелюбно бодаться и жрать одежду, уплетая клочок за клочком. Она будет брезгливо фыркать на попытки…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ShtilNaMore67. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 645,561 of 1,629,372 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Штиль на море” (@ShtilNaMore67), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShtilNaMore67.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.