Channel
@Shoomstudio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
545subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001234762685 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Shoomstudio |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Shoomstudio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 545 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 546 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (15 August 2025 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 593 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
208 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 38.9% | |
| custom 5240046498405692667 | 41 | 19.7% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 19.2% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 7.69% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 3.85% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 3.37% | |
| custom 5215377245639549895 | 5 | 2.40% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 1.92% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.44% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.962% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.481% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shoomstudio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я вспомнила, почему бросила снимать рилсы 😁 потому что залетают одни смешнявки, бесит этот алгоритм! Хочу блог с качественным вокальным контентом, а не вот это вот всё Рилсы в пробном режиме снова это подтверждают 💩
😭7custom 52400464984056926676❤2🍓2🌚1
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Anna Bogdanova
❓Почему в некоторых нотах ноты СИ и СИ бемоль пишутся как Н и В, а в некоторых как В и B♭ Это след одной средневековой «типографской случайности» В старой нотации нота си существовала в двух видах: круглое b (b rotundum, «мягкое» наш си-бемоль) и квадратное b (b quadratum, «твёрдое» си-бекар). Кстати, именно от этих двух форм произошли сами знаки ♭ и ♮ (и даже ♯- это тоже вариант квадратного b). Дальше пути разош…
👍11❤6😱1custom 52400464984056926671
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4🔥3😱1
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Сдала генетический тест, представляете, гена чистого пения у меня нет! (И вообще я сомневаюсь, есть ли он у кого-то)) Вообще всю жизнь я отношу себя не к «природникам», а к тем, кто развивал навык потом и кровью 😄 поэтому знаю, как непросто бывает людям, которые осваивают вокал
❤14
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Как вам исполнение? Очень интересный и необычный голос у вокалистки! Слышите, она как будто поет в октаву сама с собой! Реабилитологи мои диванные, как вам кажется, здорОво это звучит или не очень? Дайте реакций, и своим видением я поделюсь в следующем году 🩷
custom 52400464984056926677👍4🤬2😱2
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Мэрайа Кэри смотрит на трибьют в её честь на одной из премий
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Разберем, пожалуйста, голос девушки - уличного музыканта в Москве. Что с ней происходит? Она форсирует или использует капитальный вокальный приём? Давайте разбираться 👇 Большинство ответили правильно, но верный ответ был не так очевиден - ниже поясню. Эта хрипота действительно звучит классно, фактурно, и девушка, скорее всего, это осознаёт. Она специально форсирует голос, чтобы он стал более сиплым и жёстким. Ключе…
❤14👍2
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Я почти доработала практикум ✨ он рассчитан на новичков и людей, которые давно или совсем немного занимались вокалом. Осталось сделать 3-4 видео с упражнениями, аранжировать их, записать вокал и видео, смонтировать и дать на оценку своим постоянным ученикам 😀 работы на 1 день максимум, но это время нужно где-то найти. Сейчас ищу дизайнера сайта, если у вас есть контакты, буду очень благодарна за рекомендации. Це…
❤15👍6🍓1custom 52153772456395498951custom 52400464984056926671
Signed Anna Bogdanova
🐱 Инсайт из интервью с Пугачёвой: «Я не думала о технике, о нотах, когда пела. Я просто пела, как чувствовала, и всё» Нам многим этого не хватает. Техника - это классно, но часто замечаю зацикливание на диапазоне, мелизмах или чём-то ещё сродни ОКР. В постановке техники я всегда помогу. Но эмоциональная искорка всегда идёт сначала от самого вокалиста ✨🌸
❤17👍5🤓1
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Итак, минутка стендапа от человека с необычным голосом. На 1:20 примерно он говорит, что разговаривает на ложных голосовых складках. Я, конечно, не фониатр, но как бы ЛГС совсем не так звучат 😄 коллеги (и простые смертные), что думаете? поделитесь мнением Что это? Фониатр облажался, он что-то не так запомнил или у него действиетльно такое уникальное строение ложных голосовых?
❤3🌚3custom 52400464984056926671
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Ловите наглядное видео по вокальной анатомии ❤️ Для всех тех, кому интересно и полезно посмотреть, что там у нас внутри, но кому страшненько смотреть живые фото и видео 😁 Здесь всё схематично и на русском языке. Не забывайте ставить ваши благодарные ❤️, это быстрый и бесплатный способ сказать «спасибо» #полезное_shoom
custom 524004649840569266723🔥10❤9👍5custom 52153772456395498954
Signed Anna Bogdanova
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Shoomstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Уроки вокала с Shoom Studio 🇩🇪” (@Shoomstudio), 545 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shoomstudio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.