https://x.com/CryptoShlug/status/2075510029965312332

Channel
Shlug's Snedoooors
@ShlugSned
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
661subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002423936892 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShlugSned |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShlugSned |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 661 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 671 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 672 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 674 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 670 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 678 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 687 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 689 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 689 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 14 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Cash Cat Buy! 🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯 💰 285.00 ETH ($508,428.60) 🪙 3,031,857 CASHCAT 🏷️ Price: $0.1782 🔼 Mkt Cap: $178,248,813 🔍 0xc1ad...0054 ⬆️ Position: >1000%! Tx | Chart | Web | X
Will share more on what my Hoodfolio looks like later
Lots of strong-looking tokens already, have bags of about five or six different shitters. Lots of the scammers have made their way to the green chain as of now. Look for tokens that are 14+ days old. Otherwise you are just donating to skem devs.
Feels like it could have a mega run to reignite liquidity flow to the trenches. Basically everything the base eco should have been
GM GM, anons. green chain showing crazy strength, cashcat ATH breaking $180M right now, huge.
File, posted without a caption
Also took advantage of this on-chain liquidity fragmentation event to double my $LSM bag. Nothing has changed here as regards the tech or development. Igor is still updating day by day, making good progress. Token was probably too pumped, too quick. Didn't get a chance to build support levels. Rebounding now where there are sellers there are buyers. Sub $100k for this one in 3-6 months' time will look like a generati…
Why token: x.com/usedecentralorg/status/2075168564039057740
AI inference is still a shit-hot meta right now. Could do well at such a low mcap RR looks solid here
Think this looks interesting at around $55k. Had originally my bag from average $20k pre-bond, as it took many days to actually bond. Team then went silent for like six hours so my SL hit on my bag overnight lol. Re-entered as around $30k.
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ShlugSned. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shlug's Snedoooors” (@ShlugSned), 661 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShlugSned.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.